|
The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993 Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !! General Silver Forum
|
REGISTER (click here) |
How to Post Photos
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
General Silver Forum Please explain mercury gilding to me
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Please explain mercury gilding to me |
Jane Straub unregistered |
posted 06-26-2005 08:01 PM
Mercury guilding was the 18th century process of applying gold to silver. I understand this process was hazardous. Where can I find a discription of how it was done or can some explain it to me. Also, is there any risk associated with using 18th century items which have been guilded? (don't think so)Thank you. IP: Logged |
wev Moderator Posts: 4121 |
posted 06-26-2005 08:11 PM
The technique was not difficult -- an amalgam of gold and mercury was made up and applied to the base metal. It was then fired at high heat, burning off the mercury, and leaving a thin, precise, and consistent layer of gold. The danger is obvious when done in a small poorly ventilated shop using an open hearth or oven. The risk of using such pieces is generally low, though a small percentage of mercury may be left, if done imperfectly. IP: Logged |
Jane Straub unregistered |
posted 06-26-2005 08:14 PM
If the mercury was burned off in the process it certainly was a hazard to whoever was the craftsman. Thank you. IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 06-26-2005 11:57 PM
Not only the craftsman, but everyone in the general area. And beyond. IP: Logged |
Jane Straub unregistered |
posted 06-27-2005 11:05 AM
Guess I am overreacting but is there any way to be certain all mercury as been removed? Like does a good washing do it ? Or, should one assume that over 200 yrs the mercury is all gone. Just seems a shame not to use an 18th c. berry spoon because of fears of the guilding. IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
posted 06-27-2005 11:58 AM
Below is a thread that discusses mercury. mercury gilding IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 06-27-2005 05:34 PM
I have teo little spanners to throw into the works of this thread.
This brings me to my second spanner...
IP: Logged |
Clive E Taylor Posts: 450 |
posted 06-27-2005 06:47 PM
Very little risk now of mercurial gilding as the mercury is used as a flux and I believe virtually all is volatised in the process. But watch some NON SILVER Buckles. I recently experimented with a non silver buckle which had a form of - I thought - of oxidised lead/ pewter decoration almost piped on like icing a cake . It's a fairly common type to find. I discovered that the melting point was very low, and yes it seems to have been applied and shaped whilst molten. This I discoved by applying a blowtorch producing fumes and leadlike beads of metal Chemical analysis by a competent and careful chemist (unlike me) proved it to have a very significant amount of ANTIMONY in it. Guess what the fumes were ! I'm still alive but apparently my life expectancy is slifghtly less now !! IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-28-2005 01:05 AM
Thank you for the information. This takes us into the whole realm of hazardous antiques and how paranoid and/or careful we should be with them. My paranoia extended to removing a Queen Anne mirror to the garage for several weeks (fear of the painted mirror), throwing out a batch of glasses (fear they were lead crystal) and buying a pewter funnel and freaking out when I realized 18c. pewter has a high lead content(but never actually used it). Oh, forgot all the Victorian holiday decorations I won't take out of the box. So my question is, what does a genuine 18th cent. berry spoon look like? How can you tell the difference? IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 06-28-2005 02:23 AM
See my note above. Genuine nineteenth century examples, made new in the nineteenth century, have the appropriate marks for when and where they were made. Conversions, which were (are) cheaper as the 'old' spoon was (is) already in existence, have the marks that they started with when they were made originally. IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-28-2005 09:10 AM
But there are Georgian Berry Spoons, made @1810 which are hollow sterling and the form of the item is such that it could not be later stamped with decoration. The construction of the item is such it would not look right if made that way. And they are called, 'Georgian Berry Spoons.' I can't believe everything is a fake out there. It seems to me that some folks on this forum are only happy with an 18c. item and think it is genuine if it looks Provincial or worn out . IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-28-2005 10:05 AM
I mean, there are entire chapters in silver books on silver Hollow Ware of the early 19th century. BUT, come to think of it, I have never seen berry spoons in the silver section of a great art museum, but always thought that may be due to the fact they have such grand items of craftsmanship to display. When I actually look at the luxury and grandeur of many aspects of late 18th century life, and the sophistication of thought, I would be surprised there were no fancy Georgian Berry Spoons then.It would mean the craft was not sophisticated enough to create them at that time. From what I see, the craft was that sophisticated. I think it would be good to support a statement like Georgian Berry Spoons do not exist, that is, spoons of floral and fruit design created in the early 19th century. Please don't misinterpret me, I very much want to be enlightened here. But it seems that 18th c. items are called a 'fake' in this forum if they are anything but Provincial . Just seems like that to me as a newcomer. ps. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 06-28-2005 10:33 AM
quote: It's the right idea. Next time start the new thread before it develops as much as it did in this existing thread. Also clue the existing thread posters and lurkers in by directing them to the new topic post/thread. Your new post/thread read like a reply to comments in this exiting thread and by itself the new thread/post was floating with an implied but no direct reference back to this existing thread. Posts/thread are long lived and in a few years the connections would be lost on new readers. IP: Logged |
akgdc Posts: 289 |
posted 06-28-2005 10:43 AM
What books are you reading? They also seem to be misinformed about the definition of hollowware. Spoons are flatware. There is NO such thing as an 18th-century "berry spoon." Also no such thing as an 18th-century paper-clip holder, salad spinner, ice-cream scoop, toilet scrubber, or refrigerator magnet, either. Oh, that poor benighted century. Again, if you have questions about specific pieces, please post photos. If you need instructions on doing that, click here: How to post photos IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-28-2005 10:57 AM
I asked for you to support your statement first. IP: Logged |
akgdc Posts: 289 |
posted 06-28-2005 11:34 AM
SilverLyon gave a thorough and well-informed response. And this topic has been dealt with numerous times previously in these forums, for instance: Beyond that, just look in any reputable book on English flatware. I don't know what more you want, short of an entry in Hester Bateman's diary stating something like, "July 12th, 1788. Berry spoons have still not been invented." IP: Logged |
Richard Kurtzman Moderator Posts: 768 |
posted 06-28-2005 11:51 AM
Hi Everbody. Who's on first? IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-28-2005 12:03 PM
Thank you for the references. I will check them out.You have to understand- I can't just believe someone who says something without giving support for their statement- like, 'it's so because Tommy SAID so.' If you get my drift. But I also fully understand the cummulative effect of knowledge of a subject too. I understand when people 'feel' an object isn't 'right'. What I look for are those folks who can articulate why the feel isn't right. I am a new member and truly appreciate the kind and welcoming words by many on this forum. I do not scare off or abandon positions easily and I often need references and support for blanket statements made to me. There are many very kind folks here who understand where I am coming from and understand the learning process. If anyone (akgdc)does not care to engage in a conversation with me, that's fine! But, I have just interests here too! Have a great day! IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 06-28-2005 12:38 PM
Jane: quote: quote: quote: You seem unwilling to accept that you have been given patient, authoritative answers (some of which do not fit your preconceived notions) by informed contributors attenmpting to answer your questions, which they are not obligated to do. Are you here to argue or to learn? Please read the section on proper forum etiquette in the Guidelines. Incidentally, "guilding" is "gilding," and "soulder" is "solder." You really do have a lot to learn. -------------------- quote: People donate their time to answer questions here - they do not have the time to write a thesis for every repetitious question - if you would have first taken the trouble to have used the forums' search engine on "mercury", or "gilding" or "mercury gilding," you would have found prior discussions which might have answered your question without having to ask at all, or to have asked more informed questions based on the prior information. The same goes for "berry spoons." IP: Logged |
Kimo Posts: 1627 |
posted 06-28-2005 04:36 PM
Dear Antiqueperson, Before this spins out of control with misunderstandings and ensuing hard feelings, please let me say that since you are new to the forum you may not understand yet who these people are who have given you these answers. They are some of the most experienced and learned folks around in the area of silver collecting. I know that on some other forums there is an abundance of people who have few facts answering questions and your insistence on grilling responders about their answers would be reasonable in those kinds of places. If you lurk here a while you will soon see that the people who have taken the time to give you your answers are true experts. Your questions are asked in a way that uses phrasing that inadvertently comes across to many as strident which gives most people the impression of your not being very appreciative of their generosity. IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 06-29-2005 06:11 AM
Even at this horribly early, but blessedly cool, time of the morning it is reassuring that so many members of the forum feel protective towards the 'body' - everyone who contributes, whether experienced or new does so with an open hand. There is no personal gain to be derived from contributing. I fear that any of us can sound arrogant at times trying to express in few words things that appear obvious to us and experience that has been learned and gathered over many years. Berry spoons are alterations, not fakes - they can be misleading because they still have their original marks. Please believe me, THERE ARE NO GEORGIAN ONES made as such. Any experienced dealer who tells you differently is being disingenuous. Published sources for discussions of alterations and improvements to silver are few and far between, but the subject (Berry Spoons) is covered in Ian Pickford's admirable book "Silver Flatware, English, Scottish and Irish 1660-1980" published by the Antique Collector's Club, Suffolk, England. The Antique Collector's Club, also published a piece many years ago in their magazine Antique Collecting they may have an index and a back-issues department. Many of the people who contribute to the forums are those who WRITE the books, CURATE the museum collections, GIVE the lectures - they are here to HELP and INFORM and INSPIRE those who SHARE their interest in a subject they find fascinating. IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-29-2005 08:38 PM
Silver Lyon is articulate and presents his information in such a way that is not offensive. Thank you SilverLyon! I understand you clearly! Silver Lyon, So, the Batemans made no Berry Spoons? I mean, you can call an item a Georgian Berry Spoon but to do so is really a misnomer, it only indicates the hallmarks are Georgian- right? Please don't speak on my behalf anyone.I can speak for myself. IP: Logged |
salmoned Posts: 336 |
posted 06-29-2005 10:43 PM
You're not REALLY asking a question that's been answered so well already again, Are you? I'm absolutely positive your last question was rhetorical in nature - and yet that can only be an opinion, at best. In any case, I don't think berry spoons were beyond the capabilities of 18th century craftsmen - it was merely beyond the sensibilities of the buying public to want such a thing. In fact, I doubt anyone here could categorically state that no berry spoon as it is now recognized was ever created in the 18th century. Only that, they are rare to the point of non-existence. Oh, this is fun! IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-30-2005 07:53 AM
Interesting. You have to realize, I'm a layman. (and that's why I'm in this forum!)I don't have a lot of intricate knowledge of 'silver'. All I know is, I rarely see very old berry spoons- that is berry spoons with old hallmarks. Maybe they are sold by the barrelfull in N.Y.C. or London- but I haven't see them. So , what do decorative 18th Century spoons look like? You can discribe, links or photos not necessary. Thanks! Please understand , I'm trying to illicite Conversation. Photos, etc. not necessary, just articulation!Thanks a bunch! IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 06-30-2005 07:57 AM
And I sincerely apologize for any misspellings.I'm not very computer literate and you don't have to shame me for it. IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
posted 07-01-2005 12:33 PM
This is an interesting thread for me as it recalls to me the many times that I reviewed patents involved in infringement cases and initially thought; “This is a simple idea, surely I can find a publication that discloses this same design by someone at a earlier time.” Most or the time I found out that the U.S. Patent Office really did a good job in reviewing the prior art and I did not find an earlier work that could be used to invalidate the patent. Not finding a printed publication does not prove that that the idea had not been thought of at an earlier time, but rather shows that if someone did have the idea it was not implemented or recorded in any significant manner. This may be the case with berry spoons. It could be that some forward thinking person thought of portraying an image of berries of the face of the bowl of a spoon during the Georgian time period. However, I am not aware of any evidence recording either this idea or implementation of this idea. The March/April 2002 issue of Silver Magazine has an interesting article by D. Albert Soeffing that shows how information about designs used in different time periods can be found in unusual places. Here a letter written in 1833 discloses that the style of Old English was chosen for a monogram by a gentleman living in Kentucky. This was at a time period when the prevailing style of engraving was an italic script and backs up in time when Old English could have been used on silver in America. It also provides an insight into what Kentuckians thought of breaking with the prevailing style and trying something new. This is a good illustration of why the study of silver is interesting to me. These studies provide a real connection with the past and in that sense make the past come alive. IP: Logged |
Scotia Posts: 125 |
posted 07-01-2005 12:52 PM
Hi there, Late 18th century spoons were commonly decorated with bright cut engraving, a method of decoration leaving many facets, which reflect light. Please see this link for a better explanation: Antique Silver Spoons IP: Logged |
Antiqueperson Posts: 18 |
posted 07-02-2005 09:00 AM
Thank you for the link and enlightening me! Bright Cut, I have seen the marvelously intricate 18th. C Bright cut sugar tongs and nips. But have never seen a Georgian Berry Set. Thanks again!!! IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 05-20-2017 03:20 PM
MIT science paper: Ancient Methods of Gilding Silver : IP: Logged |
Vetdaddy Posts: 70 |
posted 06-05-2017 02:45 PM
Good read- thanks Scott. I suppose the early metal-smiths may have have also been afflicted with 'mad hatters' disease. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 06-06-2017 12:29 AM
Glad you liked it. Its more info (words) than most people have patience for (29 pages) IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 06-06-2017 01:54 AM
THE JEWELERS’ CIRCULAR July 6, 1904 pg 74 July 13, 1904 pg 74
quote: IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 06-06-2017 07:21 PM
The Jewelers’ Circular and Horological Review. FEBRUARY, 1884 pg 50-51
quote: IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |