|
The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993 Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !! General Silver Forum
|
REGISTER (click here) |
How to Post Photos
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
General Silver Forum 925 followed by a g in a diamond
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: 925 followed by a g in a diamond |
vathek Posts: 966 |
posted 10-22-2012 02:55 PM
[01-3044]
IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 10-22-2012 03:24 PM
I don't know but I am assuming this is the mark: also from 2005: Help Identifying a Silver Mark IP: Logged |
vathek Posts: 966 |
posted 10-22-2012 04:09 PM
Thank you Scott, that is the mark, but it was not in my older edition of Rainwater and I noticed that it was not identified in the older post, and that's why I'm a bit suspect.It was on some Art Nouveau-ish pieces but the fonts in the mark don't look that old. [This message has been edited by vathek (edited 10-22-2012).] IP: Logged |
jersey Posts: 1203 |
posted 10-23-2012 04:11 PM
Hi vathek! Just a shot in the dark but have you tried the Chicago Silver for the Jewelers circular of 1922.
There is a company called J.A. & S.W. Granbery 31 E. Kinney St. Newark N.J. The mark listed there looks very much like your G in a diamond. Hope this helps. Jersey IP: Logged |
vathek Posts: 966 |
posted 10-23-2012 05:16 PM
Thank you Jersey that's it. After poking around a bit on the net I found a match safe with the exact mark and 925, so they aren't repros. IP: Logged |
jersey Posts: 1203 |
posted 10-24-2012 07:02 AM
Vathek, You are most welcome, glad I could be of help. Thank you too Scott, as always for your assistance. Jersey IP: Logged |
Paul Lemieux Posts: 1792 |
posted 10-24-2012 01:10 PM
I have always seen the G in a diamond mark on reproduction match safes, including pieces I know to have originally been produced by other manufacturers, and continue to believe it is a mark on reproductions only. Sorry to disagree with the Granbery attribution, but I do not think that is the correct identity of the maker. If you google J.A. & S.W. Granbery (in quotes) you will find a few of their items, mostly gold and gemstone mediocrity from the 1920s. Perhaps whoever was making the match safe reproductions somehow obtained the old Granbery mark punch and used it in an attempt to lend credibility to the repros. I have seen the G in a diamond mark with 925 STERLING and just 925. It was not common practice at the time for American manufacturers to use the 925 designation, and exceptions generally tend to say "925/1000" or some variation, often as part of a more elaborate system of marks. Adding to the confusion is another mark which is "STERLING G". I have seen this as a raised mark on match safe lips and also stamped as "STERLING-G" on brooches, they are probably variations of the mark for a single maker. It is confusing because both marks incorporate a letter G, but the STERLING-G pieces are actually from the early 20th century; I can attest to this having examined several pieces that are right relative to construction, patina, and other details such as hand-engraved period monograms. Furthermore, the STERLING-G items are stylistically very similar to G in a diamond pieces in that they are of middling quality and frequently adorned with insipid late Victorian and Art Nouveau decoration. At the very least, though, the STERLING-G pieces I have seen are antique. Finally, I found a reference to something called "Antique & Collectors Reproduction News," the May 2002 issue of which apparently addresses the G in a diamond series of knockoff match safes. However I was unable to locate text or images from the article online--perhaps one of our members has access to this article. [This message has been edited by Paul Lemieux (edited 10-24-2012).] IP: Logged |
vathek Posts: 966 |
posted 10-24-2012 03:54 PM
Paul: I have to admit what you posted above was my first reaction to the pieces when I was examining them. IP: Logged |
Richard Kurtzman Moderator Posts: 768 |
posted 10-26-2012 03:10 PM
quote:
IP: Logged |
Richard Kurtzman Moderator Posts: 768 |
posted 10-26-2012 03:15 PM
IP: Logged |
vathek Posts: 966 |
posted 10-26-2012 03:36 PM
Those are definitely the marks I saw. One was an Indian chief match safe but it wasn't that well done. It's good to know that these fakes are out there. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |