|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
Continental / International Silver Estonian walkingstick
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Estonian walkingstick |
sazikov2000 Posts: 254 |
posted 02-24-2005 04:19 AM
I got an Estonian walking stick, silver 875/1000, no mark of the silversmith (very unusual!)but again the mystery mark which looks like Pt (but it is P and L with a slash). Question: the only country I know using this letter is Poland. I can not find this exact mark in the Polish mint. So what could it be? Import-Exportmark? Any help welcome. IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 02-26-2005 07:21 PM
Sazikov, I have been watching this post, hoping Blackstone would weigh in with an answer. Other than confirming that the piece is interwar period Estonian, which I am sure you already know, I cannot answer your question as a silver collector. However, as an historian however, I have a thought. Since Poland and Estonia were both carved out of territory from imperial Russia and Germany after WWI, perhaps silversmiths from the old empires stayed in the new countires and kept their marks. Could the mark be Russian? Just speculating, IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 02-26-2005 11:18 PM
I can't help with the marks, but it is a darn fine elephant! It would be a shame if the maker goes unrecognized. IP: Logged |
sazikov2000 Posts: 254 |
posted 02-27-2005 12:01 AM
Thank you Tom- thank you swarter- for your responses. To make everything more complicated, I got this stick from an old woman (95 years old!)in Valga (Estonia), who bought it together with her father 1922 in Tallinn (Estonia) in a shop (which does not exist anymore). No connection to Russia or Poland! Since this day the stick was always in the family, mostly burried or hidden to avoid theft from the different occupants. The elephant is a typical Baltic symbol for strength, faithfullness and constance and you can find it often on silver cigaret cases and the silver handbags for women, which were en vogue at that time. Sazikov2000 IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 02-28-2005 12:18 AM
Quite the puzzle. The "L" with a slash doesn't occur in Estonian, as you point out. I suspect it was exported from Poland into Estonia (which didn't, as far as I know, have any special import marks in the 1920-1940 period.) If so, then the maker was almost certainly Piotr Latkowski of Warsaw, an early to mid- 20th century maker, who used an identical "PL" in an oval mark, complete with slashed "L". IP: Logged |
sazikov2000 Posts: 254 |
posted 02-28-2005 06:54 AM
blakstone,thank you very much for your help. I have another question: Just to remember 2 fotos: Thank you very much again! IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
posted 02-28-2005 11:51 AM
I just want to add my comment that your elephant is wonderful and I am glad that the silversmith was recognized. IP: Logged |
sazikov2000 Posts: 254 |
posted 02-28-2005 12:59 PM
ahtw- I feel like you - in spite I am not very interested in walkingsticks - this one I had to have!! Thanks for the compliment( for the elsphant). Sazikov2000 IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 02-28-2005 11:30 PM
Yes, I find it confusing, too, particularly since all the references are in Polish - not the easiest language to decipher! But I can clear up a few things, I think. First, I somehow missed the photos of the napkin ring in your other post (Dealer or silversmith?); thanks for re-posting them. While it is not absolute, a good rule of thumb is that a trademark indicates the manufacturer, and a full name indicates the retailer. This is not so different from German, American or other items, where the manufacturer's trademark is a pictorial device, and the retailer's name is spelled out in full. The problem is that Warsaw manufacturers also used their own initials and/or name as well as their trademark, sometimes resulting in a set of three marks: 1. maker's initials (or name) While many Warsaw trademarks are known, others have to be deduced from the common initials or name they share. That being said, I think the triangle mark here is Latkowski's trademark; I've never seen it on a piece that didn't have his initials. That would make him the manufacturer and Antoni Zelislawski the retailer. This makes sense, since he as a manufacturer would be more likely to export something to Estonia - your cane - than would a retailer. I don't know if Zelislawski was a silversmith himself; he may well have been. It wasn't uncommon for a maker to supplement his own wares with those of a larger manufacturer, but I will say that I have generally seen his mark only with other manufacturer's trademarks; like, for instance, Bracia Hempel (Dealer or silversmith?). (I confess that I goofed when I stated in this post that �Antoni Zelislawski is known to have made items for Bracia Hempel.� I meant that the other way around � that Bracia Hempel is known to have made � i.e. supplied - items for Antoni Zelislawski.) Another well-known trademark is the anchor of Karol Malcz and his successor, Teodor Werner & Co. To sum up all these various posts: Maker: Piotr Latkowski Maker: Bracia Hempel [Hempel Brothers] Maker: Karol Malcz & Teodor Werner Whew! Hope this helps! PS: If anyone is interested (and has the patience) I can put together a little precis on Warsaw hallmarks. Let me know.4 IP: Logged |
sazikov2000 Posts: 254 |
posted 03-01-2005 02:50 AM
BLAKSTONE I KISS YOUR FEET!!! I am very grateful for your answering my numerous questions and correcting my thoughts, going in the wrong direction - now I understand many things better and learned a lot about the hallmarking system of the Warsaw silversmiths under Russian rule. Since years I tried to find some literature about the Polish silversmiths (about 1800 -1917)under Russian rule - but no success - either it is out of print since 50 years or nobody knows what I want. Last month I have been in St. Petersburg, there is an important exhibition of Polish silver in the Eremitage now, but no luck. IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 05-10-2005 01:37 PM
As promised, here’s a précis of Warsaw silver under Russian rule. Sorry for the delay, but you can imagine this took some time to put together, but fortunately I finished it just in time to repay Sazikov for some excellent help in Estonian silver hallmarks. 1800-1851: Old Warsaw Marks 1851-1852: First Interim Marks 1852-1896: Russian Imperial Marks IB (Latin) Jan Biedgunowski 1850-1865 Latin or Cyrillic refers to how the mark itself appears; i.e., Biedgunowski’s mark is just that: “IB”, in Latin characters, and Sosnkowski’s last mark would read “OC” (which is OS in Latin). Also note: the letter “I” in any of these marks, even the Cyrillic ones, is always rendered with the Latin “I”, never the reverse “N” of Cyrillic. Regarding Josef Sosnkowski, who you’ll notice appears four times in this list: there is no explanation for the gap between 1853 and 1860, but he does not appear to have been working in Warsaw during that time. He is known to have used three marks (which can all conveniently rendered as they actually appear): „IS” (1852-53 and 1860-62), „IC” (1862-1869) and „OC” (1869-1896). But for the single appearance of Pusch in 1874, Sosnkowski seems to have been the only assayer in Warsaw after 1866. 1897-1898: Second Interim Marks 1899-1908: First Kokoshnik Marks AR (Cyrillic) Aleksandr Vasileyevich Romanov 1899-April 1904 Romanov moved to the St. Petersburg office in April 1904. As a result, much Warsaw silver made 1899-1904 is mistaken for St. Petersburg, since it bears Romanov’s mark! 1908-1915: Second Kokoshnik Marks 1915-1920: Third Interim Marks That covers Warsaw marks until the Polish law of 16 Jul 1920 establishing precious metal control; the Warsaw office – the first - opened and began functioning on 1 Sep 1920. Now, to the makers. Following is a list of prominent Warsaw makers of the 19th and early 20th century and their marks. Also given is a description their known trademarks, which (as evidenced by this post) can cause confusion. Note that the dates given here are not absolute, generally being inferred from other marks and/or inscriptions. It is possible that any given maker worked a little out of the period mentioned. Unless noted, the marks appear with Latin characters Warsaw Silversmiths 1850-1930 Bauminger, Abram 1908-1915 Birkowski, Wojciech– Kazimierz Birkowki 1897-1908 Bitschan, Pavel 1888 Bretsznajder, E aft. 1920 Bugajewski, Alexsander aft. 1920 Ch, E 1908-1915 Charlap, Moszek 1897-1915 Chylinski, Jan aft. 1920 Cmoch, Franciszek 1908-1915 Cynowski, Jan 1921-1931 F, M 1893 Fraget, Joseph 1885-1908 Glebocki, Napoleon 1860 Goldman, A. 1882 Goldman, Izrael A. 1877 Gontarczyk, Wiktor 1921-1948 Hempel, Bracia 1899-1915 Jarzemski, Franciszek 1896-1915 Juwiler, Adam aft. 1920 Juwiler, Henryk aft. 1920 Kazimierz Klimowicz – Klimowicz, Sephan 1874 -1908 Kelmer, Jankiel 1873-76 Kozlowski, Michal 1897-1908 Krejnes, Dawid N. 1899-1908 Kreutzer, Joszef 1860 Krupski & Matulewicz (Wladyslaw Krupski & Jan Matulewicz) 1930s Labecki, Cyprian 1897-1898 Latkowski, Piotr 1899-1920 Lopienski, Grzegorz (later Bracia Lopienscy, ca. 1908) 1899-aft. 1920 Luther, Wilhelm 1855-1861 Majerowicz, L. 1875 Malcz, Karol 1855-1867 Mankielewicz, Michal aft. 1920 Nagalski i Psyk (Adam Nagalski) 1899-aft. 1920 Nast, Ludwik 1852-1879 Nowakowski, Maciej 1853-1855 Oksenberg, Lewek 1867 Ostrochulski 1883 Owczarski, Stanislaw aft. 1920 Paszkowski, Stefan 1858 Pogorzelski, Jan 1854-1898 Princenthal, Mojzsez 1908-1915 Radke, Emil 1852-1915 Reiner, Abram 1861-1872 Reiner, Widgor 1879 Riedel, Antoni 1879-1908 Roever, Fryderyk 1874-75 Rozenblat, Mendel 1897-1898 Sadcza, Wladyslaw aft. 1920 Schreider, Edward 1860 Swinarski, Michal 1855-1858 Szekman, Izrael 1895-1915 Szkarlat, B. 2nd half, 19th C. Szkarlat, Szmul 1883 Szkarlat, W. aft. 1920 Sztern, M. L. 1875-1876 Szyldberg, R. Hersz 1864-1872 Tapilband 1881 Utracki, Thomasz 2nd half, 19th C. Wapinski, Ludwik 1899-1908 Werner i Sa. (Teoder Werner) 1876-1896 Wietryzkowski, Boleslaw 1875 Zagorowski, Kacper 1853 Zelislawski, Antoni 1899-1908 Zybert, M 1908-1915 IP: Logged |
sazikov2000 Posts: 254 |
posted 05-10-2005 02:36 PM
Sir blakstone! I am completely overwhelmed! This is exactly the missing link for my understanding the Russian/Polish assay office habits and rules plus the different smiths and their trademarks. I do not know how to thank you for your tremendous effort and the time you spent to build this list. As mentioned before I tried since years to get this informations - always in vain. Now I am really happy and content! Thank you very, very much again! I think there are two Typos: I am deep in your dept! IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 05-10-2005 06:21 PM
Blackstone, I really do hope you write a book, which would be a great contribution to the literature. Thanks for sharing your knowledge and experience. Tom PS But then academics always encourage people to write books! IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 05-10-2005 06:48 PM
You're welcome. Sazikov: you are correct that the assay master's initals can be conveniently and coincidentally rendered in Cyrillic on a Latin keyboard as you have done. I wrote them the way I did, however, to be consistent with the earlier assayer's marks given, with "(Cyrillic)" meaning that the mark reads with the Cyrillic equivalents of the Latin characters given. But doubtless there are some errors in there, what with typing all those Polish names! Tmockait: Well, I confess I have toyed with the idea of writing a book and have made some modest progress in that direction. But there is ever so much left to discover. IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 05-10-2005 11:54 PM
Blackstone, Yes, there is always more to learn. However, no book is ever finished. Some authors publish their work anyway; the rest have their unfinished manuscripts tossed out by their heirs! Tom IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |