|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
Continental / International Silver Hallmarks on 18th C Silver spoon (Ath / aat Belgium)
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Hallmarks on 18th C Silver spoon (Ath / aat Belgium) |
Az Posts: 12 |
posted 04-04-2005 04:47 AM
[26-0327, 07-0396] Can anybody help me identify the maker of this serving spoon? One hallmark is from the city of Ath/Aat (Tardy) in Belgium. There is one book available about ath (l'Orfèvrerie en Hainaut, Mons Ath Tournai) but I sadly don't have a copy of this book. Thanks in advance for your help!
IP: Logged |
Az Posts: 12 |
posted 04-04-2005 11:49 AM
Again I found this in Belgium. Your second question is I collect antiques and this includes this object. I do not own specific literature about Belgium Silver. I thought this forum would help me figure out some items I own. IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 04-04-2005 12:41 PM
Well I have the book you mentioned, I am not a great admirer of Belgium silver, but I bought it to exclude unknown marks. It hasn’t done me much good, and won’t do you much good either. The first coat-of-arms mark is shown in a negative drawing with no explanation except it is next to a cross on a platform which is similar to your second mark which is under heading “Town marks”. In “Silver in Belgium 1500 – 1800”, a book in 3 languages which also is not of much use if you are interested in marks, a very similar mark is shown with “Ath 1777” I think we can presume it is either the coat-of-arms of Ath or of the guild. The second mark is not shown in the first book although similar ones are as I mention above. A very similar mark is identified as “Ath 1777” in the second book mentioned. I guess we can presume the last mark is a date letter for 1784, I hope you can post a picture of the spoon to see if that looks correct. If you are not thoroughly confused by now, I will continue. Neither book shows a mark similar to your third mark. Don’t feel bad they don’t attribute many marks to specific makers. The Hainaut book does however give a chronological list of silversmiths in Ath. There is a slight chance, if you can tell me what is pictured in the mark, and if the date of 1784 seems right, we might be able to attribute it to a specific maker. Sorry, but if this is a Rorschach Test, I failed because all I can see in your third mark is a bare backed mermaid plucking a chicken. IP: Logged |
Az Posts: 12 |
posted 04-04-2005 02:03 PM
labarbedor: Thank you very much for your reply and research. I will post a picture of the spoon a bit later. Also in a old catalogue (1970's) is a coffee pot with a mentioned makers mark of a Squirrels head, maybe this is also one? The 84 mark must be the date since the spoon isnt Russian! IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-04-2005 02:15 PM
quote: Mon Dieu, Maurice, you are in rare form this morning! I haven't laughed so hard in months! Merci! What's worse, though, is that it really DOES look like that! If you "failed the test," you are not alone! IP: Logged |
Az Posts: 12 |
posted 04-04-2005 02:22 PM
Its rather difficult for me to make good pictures with artificial light. The spoon is also large (14.5 Inches) that makes it also difficult to photograph.
On the back is engraved L.I.L IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 04-04-2005 02:51 PM
Leaving out whether one of us needs therapy for seeing a mermaid or a squirrel in the mark, I could not find a name associated with either idea. Most of the names seem French and Flemish is not one of the languages I speak, or want to. I presume squirrel in Flemish would be similar to Eichhörnchen, or eekhoorn, in which case it doesn’t work either. There is of course another possibility. They evidently hung signs in front of their shops, as for instance a mermaid plucking a chicken. They could then have used the same sign as their mark, without having any association with their name itself, but perhaps the place where it was located or their dietary habits, etc. There are too many names to copy here, and I don’t think it is right to post a scan, but if you send me your email address I can send it to you. Perhaps your language skills are better than mine. IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 04-04-2005 02:59 PM
I didn't see the picture before I posted the last. Obviously English is not your first language. That is a "ladle" in English, or "une louche" in French. It is a typical style for late 18th C. Belgium so I am confident in 1784. Swarter I know why you see that in the mark, I have never doubted you are every bit as demented as I am. IP: Logged |
Az Posts: 12 |
posted 04-04-2005 03:02 PM
Its indeed a very funny/curious mark. It would be great to receive a scan of the page! Thanks for your help!! I totally forgot to say or think that its a Ladle, somehow I said serving spoon! IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-04-2005 06:26 PM
Did any of the Baltic states use the 84 assay? I ask because the handle design is one that was common in Scandinavian countries (and then found its way to Scotland -- it is a perfect "Scottish Fiddle" -- and perhaps eventually to the American Midwest with the Scots-Irish immigrants). I can also see a cartoon-like clown/animal face in that figure - large mouth, wide nose, big eyes, floppy ears, and a shock of hair. I wonder what it really is? I trimmed and rotated it on the computer, and as it turned and the lighting direction reversed, the figure went negative - an effect I have seen described in the lighting chapters of photography books (also important in interpretation of aerial photogaphy)- weird. Rotated 45 degrees right, it looks like a deep sea angler fish, or a batfish, but I am not squirrly enough to see a squirrel in it from any angle! [This message has been edited by swarter (edited 04-04-2005).] IP: Logged |
agleopar Posts: 850 |
posted 04-04-2005 08:39 PM
I have enjoyed this post both for the ladle, info and chicken holding mermaid... my rorschach first impression was just a rooster (badly done) with the head and tail at the right?? IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 04-04-2005 09:55 PM
As to the style, it has to be Belgium not just because of the marks, but because of the drop, which wouldn't be found in Scotland or America. The bowl rules out, for the most part, France due to its rather Germanic depth, while of course the drop could be found on French silver. Kind of like a cloud, the mark is what you see in it. I certainly can't see a fish of any kind. I privately conceded to Swarter that I saw Red Skelton's seagull imitation in it, which of course shows how truly demented I am. My wife saw a griffin, a rooster, and finally agreed to my plucking mermaid, but I think we can discount her opinion as she has to be crazy (she married me after all). Agleopar (and I guess my wife) could actually be right, as chickens, and lions do come up fairly often in Belgium marks. Does anyone see a really sexually perverted subject in it? If so send me a private email as I am always open to new ideas. IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-04-2005 11:22 PM
I think I will go with a (bad) chicken - but only the head. The ear-like things on the side could be meant to be tufts of feathers. It is hard to thnk this is for real - looks like a bad joke.
IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 04-05-2005 02:59 PM
I thought I'd chime in here, mostly becaue I didn't want to be left out of the fun. A mermaid plucking a chicken? The mark is definitely 1784, Ath, Hainaut province, Belguim. The first coat of arms is that of the province of Hainaut (Henegouwen in Dutch). It represents a quartering of the arms of Vlaanderen and Holland and dates from the early 14th century when William I of Hainaut (aka William II of Vlaanderen and Holland) received the province from his father. The cross on a pedestal - for reasons I do not know - is the emblem (though merely a supporter on the arms) of the city of Ath. "84" here is definitely the date, not the purity. The Eastern Baltic countries - Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and, of course, Russia - did use the zolotnik method of fineness, but the western & northern Baltic/Scandinavian countries - Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland - did not. It's a moot point, anyway: Ath is in southern Belgium, near the French border, and its latitude lies entirely south of Great Britain - hardly Baltic. Ath definitely used a two digit number for the year, sometimes crowned, sometimes not. Belgian hallmarking in the late 18th century followed Dutch tradition, not French. Though the country had been occasionally coveted by the French, it had, since the war of Austrian succession, been a part of the Austrian Netherlands. (It wouldn't become French again for another decade when it was overrun by angry sans-culottes.) As such, we have typically Dutch style marks: the guild/city mark (the cross), the purity mark (the Hainaut arms), the assayer's date mark ("84", though northern Dutch cities used a date-letter system like the English), and a maker's mark - which, if pressed, I'd identify as a mermaid at her toilette (which I suppose isn't much of an improvement on chicken-plucking.) Pictographic maker's marks were not uncommon in Ath at the time; J. J. Philippron's mark, for instance, was a lion's head with its tongue sticking out. And, as has been mentioned, the ladle itself is very much in the late 18th century Belgian (which is to say, Dutch) style. I'd encourage labarbedor to attack the Hainaut book again and double-check for the maker's mark. It may not lie within, but doubtless the maker does; a pictographic mark would undoubtedly be hard to attribute unless it were canting (i.e. punning.) Now, what is the Dutch for "mermaid" and "chicken" again . . . . . ? IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 04-05-2005 03:33 PM
The book is not for students of marks. The pictures are very poor. They often show only the maker's mark and then rarely attribute it to a maker. On top of that the treatment of Ath silver si poorer that the other towns.The odd shape of the cartouche helped, but I could find nothing similar. There was a very similar ladle pictured, but the maker's mark wasn't the same or attributed either. I even checked the other towns since the silversmiths tended to move around. Sorry. IP: Logged |
Az Posts: 12 |
posted 04-05-2005 03:38 PM
blakstone, Thank you for your interesting post. Mermaid in dutch = Zeermeermin and Chicken = Kip I am pretty much sure i am not going to find the maker of this Ladle! its to complicated. Maybe I should purchase the book. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |