SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!
Continental / International Silver Forum
How to Post Photos REGISTER (click here)

customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  Continental / International Silver
tline3open  Swedish hallmark question

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Swedish hallmark question
croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-25-2005 04:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
[07-0476, 26-0292]

I have bought a very nice Swedish gilt lined silver tankard,the hinged cover with cast details and a thumb piece over a cylindrical body with various banded decoration on a spreading circular foot rim, marked with three crowns and SAM P-N and the letter L and X6 (inverted), 10 ½ inch(26.7cm) high, 28oz

I interpret these marks as follows:
makers details/ made in Lidkoping/ 1900

Does anyone know the makers details and why the 'S' is absent?

Many thanks for any comment!
Regards,
Steve

IP: Logged

tmockait

Posts: 963
Registered: Jul 2004

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 02:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tmockait     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Is it rubbed out or deliberately omitted? If the latter, my guess (and it is just a guess) is that perhaps the omission indicates a piece of second quality.

Tom

IP: Logged

croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 05:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi Tom and thanks.

I cannot discern any thinning or marks that would show any erasure.

Is there a date from which the 'S' would have always been applied?

Regards,
Steve

IP: Logged

croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 05:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi Tom, Thank you.

I cannot see any thinning or marks which might indicate an erasure.

IP: Logged

Arg(um)entum

Posts: 304
Registered: Apr 2002

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 08:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Arg(um)entum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
" ... perhaps the omission indicates a piece of second quality ..."

What is your reasoning for this surmise ?

IP: Logged

blakstone

Posts: 493
Registered: Jul 2004

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 12:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for blakstone     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I can't help with the maker, but I don't think the missing "S" is a problem. I'll have to double check my references, but I'm pretty sure the "S" for silver articles wasn't mandated in Sweden until 1912.

IP: Logged

croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 01:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thank you for your replies. Any idea whom the maker might be?

If I make it to the Mitchell Library in Glasgow I will have a dig there - may be some time before I can though!

Can anyone recommend a book on Swedish silver and its marks?

In the interim I will make sure I refresh the page several times after making a post so I don't do any duplicates!

Thank you,
Steve

IP: Logged

tmockait

Posts: 963
Registered: Jul 2004

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 11:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tmockait     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Arg(um)entum,

I posted my response before the hallmarks were posted, so I made an educated guess based on contemporary experience.

Contemporary metal articles (e.g., Canonsburg cookware) have distinguishing marks to indicate second quality material sold in their outlet store. They do this so that people will not "return" the seconds for the real thing. I visited the Delf potter works last fall, and they adulterate the Royal Delft mark for their seconds as well.

In the absence of any other evidence, I was merely making an educated guess.

Regards,
Tom

IP: Logged

Arg(um)entum

Posts: 304
Registered: Apr 2002

iconnumber posted 03-27-2005 11:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Arg(um)entum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Under Swedish law the 'Three Crowns' mark alone is only allowed on gold. When placed on silver it must be accompanied by the 'S'. To think that a maker or even retailer would erase the 'S' is certainly imaginative. And a guess it certainly is but a decidedly wild one.

[This message has been edited by Arg(um)entum (edited 03-30-2005).]

IP: Logged

croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-28-2005 08:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Arg(um)entum and Tom,

If blacstone is correct and the 'S' didn't appear until 1912 then that aspect is explained at the tankard is clearly 1900.

Now who is the maker and where was it made?

If I can find out I will let you know, although this will not be for several weeks!

Regards,
Steve

IP: Logged

Arg(um)entum

Posts: 304
Registered: Apr 2002

iconnumber posted 03-28-2005 09:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Arg(um)entum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"If blakstone is correct ..." ?? frown

He is always correct. smile The 'S' was not required up to and including 1912. In 1913 it was introduced with some other changes to the law.

Your piece was assayed at Linköping so it probably was made somewhere in that area. As to the maker I am clueless.

[This message has been edited by Arg(um)entum (edited 03-28-2005).]

IP: Logged

Kimo

Posts: 1627
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 03-28-2005 12:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kimo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am always troubled when I see things like a double struck mark - especially a key one like the three crowns. The upside down X6 date code is also bothersome to my sensibilities. And the difference in style between the maker's marking and the other three marks adds to my discomfort on this tankard. It may very well be right as rain, but given that spurious hallmarks are not uncommon on higher value objects, if I were the owner I would want to show it in person to a Swedish silver expert who could examine it closely to set my mind at ease.

IP: Logged

Arg(um)entum

Posts: 304
Registered: Apr 2002

iconnumber posted 03-28-2005 01:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Arg(um)entum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good advice, Kimo! The two mishaps in the marks can be explained away by a bad day. But the maker is a puzzler. I don't like to raise doubts unless the case is clear or a critical view is solicited. Here I thought that Steve is aggressive enough in his approach to research tnat if there is a problem he will discover it in short order himself. But I have to agree that your caution is very appropriate.

IP: Logged

croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-28-2005 01:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good point and one in my naivety I had overlooked! The hallmark on the body has been stamped twice for the maker - the rest is OK!

Not such a good photo:

IMG]http://www.smpub.com/ubb/images/05/26-0292-41360841a.jpg[/IMG]

However, fortunately I find the piece so wonderful I'm not sure I would mind too much - it makes for great interest!

The idea of getting an expert second opinion I like.

Thank you, regards,
Steve

IP: Logged

tmockait

Posts: 963
Registered: Jul 2004

iconnumber posted 03-28-2005 05:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tmockait     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for sharing this interesting piece.

Tom

IP: Logged

Megasen

Posts: 2
Registered: Oct 2005

iconnumber posted 10-27-2005 08:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Megasen     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is not the Swedish "Cat's Paw" mark. The crowns are wrong. This is what it's supposed to look like:

IP: Logged

FWG

Posts: 845
Registered: Aug 2005

iconnumber posted 10-27-2005 10:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for FWG     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Courtesy of Holmquist's Svenskt Silversmide, the mark is for the firm of Samuel Petterson (1833-1903). Samuel Petterson took over the Johan Wållers shop in Linköping in late 1858 or early 1859. His son Thure Petterson (1860-1935; worked in Norrköpping 1889-1898) began working with his father in 1898, under the business name Sam. Petterson. They were taken over by K. G. Markström (of Uppsala) in 1907, became a joint-stock company in 1917, and lasted until 1965.

Personally I don't see a problem with the crowns; they seem well within the range of pieces I've seen. And the double-struck marks don't particularly bother me here. Always risky judging from photos, but the piece looks right to me. And quite nice, as well.

IP: Logged

croftcroyne

Posts: 11
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 10-28-2005 09:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for croftcroyne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dear FWG,

Thank you very much indeed for your assistance

I (was) awaiting international hallmarks in silver on loan which you have now made redundant!

Regards,
Steve

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices