|
The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993 Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !! General Silver Forum
|
REGISTER (click here) |
How to Post Photos
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
General Silver Forum testing silver
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: testing silver |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-02-2004 10:43 AM
[01-1358] Hello all, I was wondering if someone could help me with a problem I've had for some time. I purchase silver testing acid, buffing wheels etc., from a jewelry supply house in Toledo OH. My question concerns the testing acid. When I put a drop of acid on a known sterling item it simply turns the item a dull grey. The label says it contains muratic acid and nitric acid. Some other acid that I have used (ProCraft) indicated on the packaging that a "bright red" reaction was sterling. However, when this is applied to a known sterling item it turns dull grey with a HINT of red on the edges. When I use gold testing acid on known silverplate, this sometimes turns green, sometimes does not. This is a BIG problem with old silverplate (or some other metals) which turn the acid kind of dark grey or black (no green). My question is, where can I get acid which DEFINITIVELY indicates that the item is silver. IP: Logged |
June Martin Forum Master Posts: 1326 |
posted 01-03-2004 06:46 PM
I apologize in advance for not directly answering your question, but the talk of acid tests and buffing wheels when it comes to silver makes my heart sink. Invasive tests like those involving acids should be reserved for really desperate times and only as a last resort. There are so many other non-invasive ways to determine the silver content of a piece. IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 01-03-2004 07:11 PM
Acid tests in my experience are not very helpful in determining the metal content of pieces. I have learned, through many expensive failures, that the best way to spend my time and money is to buy books and study them. Learning the systems of markings, the various indication of silver content from all over the world, provides a better background for knowing about the individual pieces than any number of acid tests.
So, learn to read the marks. The basic US ones can be found in Rainwater. When something is gauranteed as sterling by a major manufacturer, it is. And when it doesn't say sterling, it almost always isn't. IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 01-03-2004 11:20 PM
I, too, react negativly at the mere mention of these practices. The procedures involved in the final stages of preparation of a silver object leave little else but silver on the surface, regardless of the nature of the underlying metal. Back when the Hunt brothers drove up the price of silver up to the point that people were bringing anything even looking like silver to the smelters and strippers (many of whom were merely opportunists looking to make a quick buck), savvy buyers would go to these places and attempt to rescue the better pieces from tne melting pot or acid bath. Often they would find these pieces pitted by acid or gauged by files in an attempt to expose the underlying metal for acid testing, which cannot be done reliably on the surface. Sometimes objects had been severely buffed in an attempt to remove these scars. It was immediately apparent from such practices that these people had no respect for silver nor had they any knowledge of the subject beyond the melt value of the metal. Therefore, the mere mention of these practices will evoke negative reactions on the part of all but neophyte silver buyers, no matter how judiciously they may be applied. There must be (and there are) better ways. I will concede that, in the hands of an experienced silversmith, a buffing wheel used judiciously can be a useful restorative tool, but otherwise its use will likely only lead to further defacement. I cannot think of any situation normally encountered that would require acid testing. IP: Logged |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-04-2004 02:21 PM
Hello, Please don't misunderstand. I am NOT about ruining silver. However, when dealing with newer sterling, one MUST buff it to get people to buy it. The "new look" works! The reason for my inquiry concerns issues that apply to these recently purchased medallion napkin rings. I hand cleaned them and they are not marked anywhere. Are they coin or are they plate? Inside of one of them one can see a faint solder seam. What should I do to determine the silver content? IP: Logged |
mdhavey Posts: 164 |
posted 01-04-2004 02:28 PM
Submit a photo here and you'll get a pretty good idea what it is from the expert opinions offered. There's a link at the top called How to Post Photos. good luck... IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 01-04-2004 03:07 PM
quote: I will echo what Dale and swarter have said. Experience is best. But before we even get to asking the question about metal content, there may be a better question.
If it is an item of interest, either as an antique or for its aesthetic, then it doesn't really matter what it is made of. If an item is not being appreciated for its antique or aesthetic characteristics then I suppose knowing the metal content could help determine whether one could get more by reclaiming the precious metal content. Since your medallion napkin rings are solid there is an noninvasive test you can use. It is called the Specific Gravity Test. It is not hard to do but it does require an accurate scientific scale, distilled water, an accurate thermometer and some other general lab equipment. Lastly, although this test is a bit cumbersome to set up it is not hard to do but it does take some experience to get accurate results. I would not worry about testing things and just judge an item based on your experience and on what will be important to your customers. For example this weekend June and I saw some things we would have purchased except for the fact that they were unnecessarily invasively tested. After testing with acids the silver plate was damaged. We rarely buy damaged or overly polished items. You may need to educate your customers. I know several dealers who do a good job of educating their customers in the process have found that respect for an items history is often the best way to increase an items value. IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 01-04-2004 03:10 PM
I would agree with you on the customers' preference for the buffed look. IMHO out of every 1,000 people who actually buy silver from silver dealers, 999 prefer that the piece be buffed and polished. Granted, this must be done carefully, which I feel I can do, but that seems to be the market preference. From almost 30 years of silver selling experience, I would say that hand polishing is something that virtually no people who actually have spent money with me ever desired.
IP: Logged |
Richard Kurtzman Moderator Posts: 768 |
posted 01-04-2004 08:56 PM
Hi Dale, When you say "...out of every 1,000 people who actually buy silver from silver dealers, 999 prefer that the piece be buffed and polished." you're talking only about new silver, correct? IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 01-05-2004 12:40 AM
Actually I am talking about all sorts of silver, new and old and antique. My experience has been that the look of lightly buffed and carefully polished on wheels is the one people who actually buy silver prefer. When I was first starting to buy and sell, over and over I would encounter silver collectors who bombarded me with hand polishing advocacy. What I rapidly noticed was that they never bought anything from me. Just pummled me with advice. And took up a lot of my time. Ever since then I have had an almost evangelical aversion to talk of hand polishing.
[This message has been edited by Dale (edited 01-05-2004).] IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 01-05-2004 08:23 AM
To me, a dealer with a buffing wheel is like Buffy the Vampire Killer - a stake through the heart. Sure in a skilled hand buffing can work wonders. But it takes a lot of experience to achieve that skill. The realities of being a sole proprietor handling 200-500 old very dirty pieces a week will make using a buffing wheel on some or all seem to be the best use of ones time. Search back through the forums posts and you will find that patina is an very desirable feature. It takes years and years of hand handling to achieve the desired patina. Evaluation of patina can provide all sorts of insights about a piece. Once the patina is gone so are those insights. Even with the lightest of touches the using of a buffing wheel will destroy or significantly change the patina forever. I do understand that if your business is going to be successful then you have to do what makes you money: buy low, sell high, turn over inventory quickly, have repeat customers, etc. We have traveled around the country and recognize that dealers must also face the regional realities of customer preferences. It seems to me that the further south and west of Louisiana the greater the need for a mirror shine. I spent several years living in big hair country (just kidding - heck my mother is from Texas) and California where big, shinney, new is predilection of many. So to remain in business a dealer must provide a product that their marketplace will buy. I am not going to be a good customer. I suppose that if the business is pattern matching/replacements then your customers aren't looking for antiques, they want something new or near new. As such then wheel buffing 200-500 pieces a week makes sense. If on the other hand you are selling antiques it doesn't. It takes careful inspection of antique silver and a lot of experience to determine which method of cleaning might be best for a particular item of interest. When dealing with antiques, only one cleaning/polishing method does not fit all. Even if you only use the wheel, there are many different types of rouges, pads (wheels), speeds and technics to be employed and to be mastered. Use the wrong combination and you can forever alter or damage an item. I don't know if we "antiquers" will ever be comfortable with the idea of buffing. My hope is that the pattern matching/replacements dealers will take the time to learn how to inspect dirty old silver and then set aside what might be best saved from the buffing wheel. IP: Logged |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-05-2004 12:15 PM
Here is a picture of the napkin rings I was referring to earlier. Hope this works!!
IP: Logged |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-05-2004 12:26 PM
Here is a picture of the other two faces. All four are different. They are rather big, the height is 1 3/4 inches
IP: Logged |
FredZ Posts: 1070 |
posted 01-05-2004 07:01 PM
These look much like a small plated box I used to own made by Gorham with the early Gorham mark. Silver content was never an issue in it's desirability. The quanity of silver in their weight would not be worth more than a few dollars. I would not recommend testing them with acid. These rings are charming and need no test. Fred IP: Logged |
mdhavey Posts: 164 |
posted 01-05-2004 07:53 PM
For god's sake don't buff them!! In Europe and even in New England people understand the importance and uniqueness of patina. I agree with Scott--once it is gone, it will take another century or so to bring back. Why are so many Americans just plain uneducated about the beauty of age (and I mean this universally)? Why does everything west and south of New York (exempting parts of the left coast) have to be big, shiny, and new? And come to think of it, Dale, how the hell did you ever buff 200 to 500 pieces a week?? That's about... 7.5 pieces of silver per hour, based on a 40 hour week. IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 01-06-2004 12:13 AM
Wonderful napkin rings. I would agree that Gorham is a strong possibility. As to plate, coin or sterling: who cares? They are great whatever they are.
[This message has been edited by Dale (edited 01-06-2004).] IP: Logged |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-06-2004 10:40 AM
Hi all, Thanks for the feedback concerning the napkin rings. However, your comments illustrate my dilemma. The key here is plate or sterling/coin. This makes a BIG difference in pricing them here in Ohio. If I call them sterling/coin maybe $150.00. As a pair of plated rings, I doubt I'd get more than $60.00. Feel free to attack me!! IP: Logged |
Kimo Posts: 1627 |
posted 01-14-2004 02:53 PM
Can you really get the higher prices when the pieces are unmarked? Whenever I see items that are identified as "sterling" or "coin" and have that modifier "unmarked but acid tested" or such I just assume they are silverplated and buy according to their overall quality. I think another concept that average buyers need eductation on is the price of an ounce of silver. Unless an item is very large and heavy, the intrinsic value of silver is very tiny. For example, today's price is only $6.40 an ounce. The value is in the artwork as brought to life by the quality of the silversmith and this includes as a major factor the quality of the patina. Losing the patina means losing a large part of the artistic value. The other large part of the value is in the historical meaning of a particular item as being a time traveler that connects us to another era and place. IP: Logged |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-15-2004 12:50 PM
Yes I can get MUCH better prices if an item is guaranteed NOT to be silverplate. In Ohio, plate really doesn't sell for much. Common stuff is almost given away. At the mall I am at, we refund if gold isn't gold and silver isn't silver (solid). Also, I've been at this mall for over five years and have a bit of a "following" so people trust my opinion. These napkin rings are a bit of a puzzle though. How should I describe them? What is your opinion about the values I posted earlier? IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 01-15-2004 01:41 PM
As someone who started out in the silver business years ago in Chicago, I know just what you are talking about. Sounds like the market has not changed in 30 years. Do you still get the yoyo's running around with their scales? Used to offer 90%of spot plus a dollar a piece for Tiffany, Whiting, early Gorham. Would stand there, screaming and yelling, waving cash in their hands. This is a profile of the typical midwestern silver buyer, IMHO and long experience. Loud, coarse, vulgar, nasty, aggressive, in your face. This group, and there are lots of them, needs work. If these were mine, here is what I would do. Put them away and enjoy them. When I had enough really nice silver I would set off to do shows, flea markets whatever. Would head west to I55. Then south on 55 to I40. West again to Little Rock. Or a short jog east into Memphis. Here is where silver country begins IMHO. The difference in silver buyers is like night and day. In this area there are wonderful customers. Lovely people. Knowlegable, polite, refined. People who know and love silver. Continuing to the southwest: Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Fort Worth, Tulsa, Oklahoma City. All of them have knowlegable silver buyers. At least one of whom would recognize your napkin rings and be ready to pay for them. Medallions are fairly well known, have many collectors and should have a ready market. But that may be just me. I am totally burned out on midwestern silver buyers. There is one possibility overlooked here. The medallions themselves may be sterling/coin applied to a plated ring. The midwest can be great for buying silver. Selling silver there is a form of degredation in my experience. I would hoard up all the good stuff. Start out after NewYears in south Texas, move north with the spring. In that part of the world, the spring is magnificent. By late February, head home to pile it up for another winter in Texas. Just my opinion of course, Dale IP: Logged |
Kimo Posts: 1627 |
posted 01-16-2004 05:10 PM
It sounds as if there may be an opportunity for dealers to take their low quality sterling to your region and make a killing selling it for inflated amounts to your typical customers, cherry pick the ultra high quality plate from them for peanuts and take it to parts of the country with educated silver collectors and make an even bigger killing. By the way, in your last post you asked for our opinion on the value of your rings. It is against forum rules to talk about values of specific items. You might want to review the forum rules at: http://www.smpub.com/ubb/SSF-Guidelines.html IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 01-16-2004 06:04 PM
Over the years, my show circuit shifted from the MidWest to the South and West. And the situation with collectors was a major factor. In the South and West there are wonderful people who collect and deal in silver. There are such people in the MidWest, but they are few and far between. Which is surprising. MidWesterners generally try very hard to be pleasant and congenial people. And succeed for the most part. Except for the silver collectors. Even this does not cover most of them; there are nice collectors in the MidWest. Just not very many of them, and most had come from other regions of the country. Looking back, I can recall dozens of instances where someone in my booth would suddenly realize that the pieces were plated. Suddenly, they would scream out something about 'trash' and 'deception'. Then forcefully throw the silver onto the concrete floor. Had this happen once with a really great piece of Pairpoint. Kimo, you are very right. It is a great place to buy. But selling silver is a real problem there. Just my opinion and experiences of course, Dale IP: Logged |
bill Posts: 20 |
posted 01-16-2004 08:56 PM
Hi rgsantiques. I rent a space in an antique center in CT and sell coin silver and sterling. I tag the pieces and guarentee if it is coin and not marked. The piece must be polished or it will not sell. I also use a tumbler with dry fine crushed corncob it does a great job polishing silver. It does not remove any metal. Thanks Bill IP: Logged |
rgsantiques Posts: 8 |
posted 01-19-2004 11:05 AM
Thanks Bill, One problem, I still don't know what to call these. I think they are coin, but I've received quite an education on this subject. I'll tag these napkin rings as follows "Mid 1800s medallion napkin rings" and leave it that. IP: Logged |
Sue :) unregistered |
posted 01-23-2004 10:54 PM
I find this discussion fascinating. As a relatively new collector of silver, I have often wondered how to evaluate silver content of pieces (mostly modernist artisan jewelry) which are not marked, without doing invasive testing, which, from what I've read and heard, can be quite destructive to the items being tested. Found an interesting item on a message forum the other day in which a collector was going around with a heavy duty magnet to test for silver content of jewelry in some department stores; he said items which were attracted to the magnet weren't sterling (and he said he found quite a few of these items being sold as sterling silver in the marketplace today). I wonder if this is true? Also, would a magnet react to silverplated items as well as non-silver items or not? Just curious... Best wishes, Sue IP: Logged |
Paul Lemieux Posts: 1792 |
posted 01-24-2004 02:45 AM
I will never use a buffing wheel on a piece of silver. Even if there are spots of corrosion or tarnish that I cannot remove otherwise, I would rather have a couple of blemishes than a horrible mirror finish on the entire piece. I will usually pass on anything that has so much tarnish/corrosion that only a buffing wheel can remove it. My heaviest cleaning measure is a cotton sock with Simichrome brand polish. And after dozens of uses, the sock is now black with old Simichrome and tarnish, so I rarely even have to put new Simichrome on the sock. As for your specific napkin ring question, I am not sure the answer. Often, solid silver napkin rings are more flexible than plated examples because the latter are made of some kind of thick base metal. Also, the lack of marks does not necessarily mean they are plated. Of the mid-Victorian napkin sterling/coin rings I have handled, I bet at least half were unmarked, or only had a factory number. I do not know why so many napkin rings were not marked with silver content or maker's names. If you can see the solder line, that could be a sign of being silver. Since plated examples would be plated after the ring was soldered together, the plating would most likely cover the seam. Perhaps somebody who has handled more silverplated napkin rings than I can tell us if the solder seam shows through the plate? Your rings date c. 1865-1870. Sue, in response to your questions: I have had one occasion to test an item for silver content. I sold an item on eBay as solid silver (in fact, an unmarked 1870s napkin ring). The buyer disputed my claim, and asked me to test it. So I rubbed the bottom edge of the napkin ring against the touchstone until I had a sufficient deposit, on which I dropped the acid. This was not overly invasive. It just left a barely visible scuff on the bottom edge of the napkin ring. (And it was silver). Some metals are not magnetic. This includes silver. If an item is attracted to a magnet, it is not silver. [This message has been edited by Paul Lemieux (edited 01-24-2004).] IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 01-24-2004 12:52 PM
A magnet should only be attracted to ferrous metals (iron or steel), or those with some iron content. It would easily separate stainless steel from solid silver. There was once a method of plating used, similar to Sheffield plating, in which a thin sheet of silver was bonded to a ferrrous metal base - this was known as close plating, and can be found on antique objects, especially flatware, and also could be detected by use of a magnet. IP: Logged |
Sue :) unregistered |
posted 01-24-2004 03:59 PM
Dear All, Thanks for the helpful information. I think I will stick with the magnet test, as it is non-invasive and not likely to damage any of my collection. Best wishes, Sue IP: Logged |
Arg(um)entum Posts: 304 |
posted 04-19-2004 03:06 PM
Sue, or anyone else really interested in magnetism as it relates to silver: Here is a link [no longer a good link - 2011] to a post dealing with this topic as it relates to new silver jewellery. If you like this you might want to pick through the entire thread listed at the bottom of the page. The initial post is also quite fun to read. IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
posted 04-20-2004 03:02 PM
This comment is not quite in line with where the discussion has gone, but I think it fits in somewhere. In the book Old Plate Ecclesiastical, Decorative, and Domestic; Its Makers and Marks by J.H. Buck, reference is made to the mode used for testing the fineness of gold and silver during the Middle Ages. A touch-stone of Basanite was touched with multiple touch-needles of known alloys and compared with touch marks of the object tested. This imprecise method faded away and by the 14th century a chemical assay method was used in which a number of grains were scraped off the article from various parts, wrapped in lead and heated in a cupel. The remaining "button" was flattened, rolled out into a strip, which was coiled into a sort of screw and placed in hot diluted nitric acid. They then compared the weight of the remaining metal with the weight of the metal taken off to begin with. The author rightly points out that this time consuming method used to protect the customer was a real tribute to the guilds. As they were dealing with new items no concern existed of destroying patina. I suppose if scratches were made in the tested object, the silversmith could polish them away. My question is how long was this method used by the English or is it still used being used by the English. Several more recent books discuss a silver analysis method called x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. This method was used by The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum and I assume it is a nondestructive method. Is the method used by Winterthur still the analysis technique used by museums and is it available to the general public? IP: Logged |
nihontochicken Posts: 289 |
posted 04-20-2004 10:27 PM
Re the referenced article, the density approach is about the only technique that is done relatively easily at home, with reasonable accuracy (though perhaps the new acid marking pens work well - I haven't tried them or personally heard from anyone who has). Here are two density approaches that I published earlier on a gold board with respect to the authenticity of gold coins. The techniques are, of course, equally applicable to silver items. These are just an expansion on the approach given in the referenced web site above. Here may be the easiest ways to measure density without lab volume measuring equipment. Method #1: First, weigh the coin. Then, fill a small container (diameter just larger than the coin, height significantly greater than coin width) to the brim with water (use an eye dropper to place in the last few drops to get a repeatable volume, fill to the overflow). Now weigh a piece of dry paper towel, place it under the container, quadruple folded, and gently place the coin in the container without agitation (use tweezers), causing the water to overflow onto the towel. There should be no air bubbles clinging to the coin. Use a piece of the towel to soak up any overflow drops left on the outside of the container. Reweigh the wet towel. The difference between the dry and wet towel weight is the weight of the displaced water, which is converted to volume using 1 gram per cc or ml (you can temperature correct this, but the difference will likely be less than the precision of your scale and lab technique). Divide this volume into the coin weight (mass, for purists), to get the density, and compare to that of pure gold. The less pure the gold, the lower your calculated density will be to that of pure gold. The problem with this technique is that you tend to slosh more water out of the container than is equivalent to the coin volume, giving a lower density result than is fact. Method #2: More math, less lab technique, no need to ease the coin without sloshing. Just add water with dropper to overflow in both cases, with and without coin, don't bother caring about what happens to the overflow (except don't leave it on the container exterior or on the scale). Separately weigh the coin, the container full of water without the coin, and the container full of water with the coin. The density of the coin will then be the quantity of the weight of the coin times the density of water (simply 1g/cc in cgs system), divided by the quantity of the weight of the coin plus the weight of the full container without the coin minus the weight of the full container with the coin. Coin Density = (Wt. Coin x 1g/cc) / (Wt. Coin + Wt. Full Container W/O Coin - Wt. Full Container With Coin) Here are some densities I found, in grams per cc (or ml): Metal Density IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 04-21-2004 09:10 AM
What nihontochicken is trying to describe is the Specific Gravity Method. The approached described will not produce accurate results. IP: Logged |
nihontochicken Posts: 289 |
posted 04-21-2004 12:13 PM
Scott, what is your definition of "accurate"? Admittedly, this method will become less accurate as the surface to volume ratio of the item at hand goes up (hence the ratio of the weight of the item to that of the container and water goes down), e.g., will work reasonably well for flatware, but not so well for holloware. The mathematics are exact. What is possibly inaccurate is the lab technique and the limitations of the scale employed. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 04-21-2004 03:31 PM
I know that the following smacks of self-promotion but if I hadn't written the book I would be referring you to it. There is a chapter in my book that describes two different Specific Gravity Test methods that are generally accepted as being reasonably scientifically accurate. There are other methods and variations but these were selected because they are the ones most used by appraisers, institutions and coin specialists. Believe it or not things like using distilled water and temperature can greatly skew the results. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |