|
The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993 Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !! General Silver Forum
|
REGISTER (click here) |
How to Post Photos
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
General Silver Forum communion set
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: communion set |
middletom Posts: 467 |
posted 04-24-2006 07:29 PM
[01-2423] I'm trying again to post photos, but I decided to try with the communion set I made for my church a few years ago. I apologize for the glare from the chalice, but under that glare is a United Methodist emblem as on the bowl.
Geoff IP: Logged |
middletom Posts: 467 |
posted 04-24-2006 07:32 PM
The node of the chalace and the base of the bowl are of Blood Wood. I have the bowl set up on a block of wood for the photo, that isn't a part of the bowl. IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 04-24-2006 08:17 PM
Very nice work. To eliminate the glare, turn off your flash if your camera allows that. If not, try taking pictures during day light and against a flat grey background. Tom IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-24-2006 08:54 PM
You can also cover the flash with a couple of layers of handkercheif to act as a diffuser and soften the glare. Very nice work indeed. [This message has been edited by swarter (edited 04-24-2006).] IP: Logged |
adelapt Posts: 418 |
posted 04-25-2006 09:37 PM
Thanks for showing us your work Middletom. Did you form the pieces by raising, or spinning? It's always interesting to see such things. IP: Logged |
FredZ Posts: 1070 |
posted 04-25-2006 10:25 PM
Nice work Geoff, I love the simplicity of the forms and the wood is a nice contrast. I suspect the parts are screwed together? Fred IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-25-2006 10:50 PM
Pardon my heathen ignorance, but do the clean lines and lack of ornamentation imply anything about the denomination? I have a pair of early 19th Century objects by John Wolfe Forbes which I have thought might be a communion set, and they are also (uncharacteristically?) plain. IP: Logged |
middletom Posts: 467 |
posted 04-26-2006 04:08 PM
Thank you all for your kind words and suggestions for eliminating the glare. Now that weather is better, I'll take it outside and photograph it without the flash. I do believe I can shut that off. The design is plain for the reason that I like that look. And Methodists tend to be plain people. I raised the pieces(there is another bowl, but couldn't fit it into the picture size), the base of the chalice being the most challenging. As I narrowed down the neck of the base, I had to make a stake to fit into it as I hammered; the stake was made from a large nail. Once I came to plannishing, I had nothing to properly back the silver(the nail only worked with the rough raising), so the upper third of the base was burnished. Many a lunch hour I spent with the base against my chest as I burnished away the heavy hammer marks. This was the first raising of any complexity that I had done, it was an adventure, and it came just as I had drawn it on paper. Fred, the chalace is screwed and epoxied together, so I'll never be able to take it apart. I wanted it strong because I would not be able control how it was handled once the church had it. Actually, the ladies at church have been very careful. The piece of blood wood that I acquired for making the node and the bases was only an inch thick, and as that was the height I wanted for the node itself, I glued two other pieces of the wood to the node piece, top and bottom, then drilled down through either side of the center and glued two pieces of music wire in the holes to hold the whole wooden piece together. The bases of the bowls I had turned by an instructor in the fine furniture department at the North Bennet Street School in Boston. Swarter, I've seen communion sets plain and fancy so I don't know if there are guidelines for how they should look, except that, probably, Protestant ones tend to be simplest. IP: Logged |
asheland Posts: 935 |
posted 04-27-2006 01:52 AM
Those are very nice, how did you mark them? The Unicorn mark? IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 04-27-2006 02:24 AM
Wonderful work Geoff. Why do you call this a bowl rather than a patten? Just wondering. [This message has been edited by Dale (edited 04-27-2006).] IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 04-27-2006 02:11 PM
Swarter, Communion cups (as opposed to Chalices) from the Reformed tradition (Calvanist = Presbyterian, UCC, etc.)would tend to be plain and might not even be metal. Calvin rejected the onrnamentation of the Catholic Church, which inclued statues, altar rails and other decoration. Catholic and Epsicopal Chalices would usuall be more ornate. There may even have been a requirement at one time that they be made of precious metal, but I would not swear by this (no pun intended). Chalices also varied over time with, for example, Barqoue ones being quite ornate, and contemporary ones far less so. Tom IP: Logged |
middletom Posts: 467 |
posted 04-27-2006 04:25 PM
I marked them with my mark, the unicorn head. The chalace has a concaved silver bottom with the marks and is perforated in the center with a cross to assure that if any moisture should get inside, it can be dried out. As to why I referred to a "bowl" rather than a patten, I was ignorant of the proper terminology. Thank you for filling me in on that. Whether the proper term for the wine holder is cup or chalace, I don't know. I have always heard the wine(actually grape juice)holder referred to as a chalace. Perhaps mine isn't large enough to be a chalace. Also, I have seen old communion sets that have a large tumbler shaped silver wine holder, which could be rightly referred to as a cup. IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-27-2006 05:02 PM
Geoff, I think you were correct in referring to your object as a bowl, although bowls are rarely on a pedestal. I am no expert on these things, but I have been doing some reading: Patens (one t) are flatter, either flat plates or nearly so; some are even footed. Bowls can be either deep or shallow, but are capable of holding liquid (whether or not they are used for that purpose); patens are intended for bread or wafers, and cannot hold liquid. Chalices are cups raised on a stem; the tendency in America was (is?) to refer to them as communion cups, rather than chalices (at least among Protestant denominations). IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 04-27-2006 11:04 PM
Among Roman Catholic, Episcopalian and some Lutheran churches, chalices are frequently owned by the clergy person, not the congregation. The book on Chicago silver makes this point: touching on how special commissions for chalices to commemorate an ordination or anniversary were a mainstay of the surviving Chicago silversmiths for many years. There are many wonderful examples of these. Sometimes they are shown in museums and craft fairs. Some have the name of the clergy person engraved along with parishes and dates of service. These are really wonderful items. I suspect the term needed here is 'high church'. High churches, with liturgy and 'smells and bells' do seem to require somewhat more in the way of objects than 'low churches'. The paten (why is there only one 't', it is not pronounced that way?) is used to hold the eucharistic wafer during distribution to the communicants. There are patens raised up like the one Geoff has made. The idea is to hold the paten under the chin of the recipient to prevent the wafer from falling to the ground. The kind shown here is much more easily grasped than flat ones. Most chalices that I have personally handled have been gold plated on the inside with the gold extending from the rim for about 1/2" on the outside. It is sometimes the custom to mount opals and agates on the chalice. They will be replaced with amathysts when the person becomes a bishop.
IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-28-2006 01:21 AM
Terminology seems always to be a problem in these arcane subjects. I have leafed through a couple of books (heavily illustrated) on early ecclesiastical silver and pewter: American Church Silver (MFA) and Pewter in Pennsylvania German Churches. The terms chalice, basin, plate, salver, and paten are used. The chalices are all rather plain, on baluster stems, and none are encrusted with jewels; the few patens are all flat plates (no bowls) on a pedestal (like the Forbes piece I have); the term communion cup is not used. This terminology is at variance with that in other sources (Fales' American Silver, Newman's Dictionary of Silver, etc), in which chalices are called communion cups (in Protestant churches, at least) and plates, salver, and patens (as used above) are all called patens - the form with the pedestal or central foot is considered the latest to have appeared. Who is to decide which is correct? As to why "paten" is pronounces "patten," the pat answer would be "because Webster says it is." Consider that, while a registered design is a patent (like a pat on the head), something open and obvious is patent (pronounced paytent). After all, this is English, and not Latin - English may be the only language in which a garage fire results in the car burning up and the house burning down (while it goes up in smoke)! In other words it is because it is. Go figure. N.B. Speaking of Webster, "he" says a paten is a plate. [This message has been edited by swarter (edited 04-28-2006).] IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 04-28-2006 03:39 PM
From the New Catholic Dictionary: "The cup used at Mass to contain the Precious Blood of Christ, to commemorate that used by Our Lord at the Last Supper. A chalice is usually from 8 to 11 inches in height, with a wide base, a stem with a knob midway, and a cup. The whole may be of gold or silver, or the cup only. In case of poverty it is permitted to make the cup of inferior metal, but this must be gold-plated within. Chalices are blessed by a bishop, who anoints them with holy chrism, a ceremony which goes back to the time of Saint Gregory the Great (590-604). Formerly, if a plated chalice needed re-gilding it had to be reconsecrated, but under the present law this is not necessary. In art the chalice is a symbol of the Holy Eucharist, and is often depicted with a Host above it. It is also an emblem associated with Saints Bruno, Barbara, John the Evangelist, and Thomas Aquinas. As the Sacramental Cup, it signifies faith. Saint John is represented with a chalice and a serpent issuing therefrom, referring to an unsuccessful attempt to poison the Host, the serpent symbolizing the poison."
Protestant clergy also receive communion cups as ordination and other gifts. In the Presbyterian Church these are of various materials and may be called chalices or communion cups. My wife, an ordained Presbyterian Minister, has several of potter and one of pewtery. In his aptly named book, "Can you drink this cup?," the late Priest and writer Henry Nouwen talks about a beloved Chalice that was in his family for generations and given to him upon his ordination by an uncle. Regards, IP: Logged |
middletom Posts: 467 |
posted 04-28-2006 03:47 PM
I see I've been misspelling chalice, I'd better get my act straight. I made bowls for this set because we use actual bread, cubed small, and very few cubes would have been able to stay on a flat plate or paten. The church I grew up in(not Methodist) used a large bowl for the bread cubes and I've never seen a flat paten used. I was working from experience. I wish to add at this point that the digital camera I used for these pictures shows the blood wood lighter and somewhat orange in tone compared to the way it appears in person. I also, formerly, took pictures of the set with film and the wood came out the proper color in those prints. I don't know if the digital sees things a bit different or if it was just a matter of lighting differences. IP: Logged |
Kimo Posts: 1627 |
posted 04-28-2006 05:22 PM
From my own experience as an Episcopalian who has attended quite a few churches and cathedrals of this denomination around the world, every one has always had very plain chalices and patens. There are basically two kinds of Episcopal churches - high and low which only means ones that are more formal and traditional vs. ones that are less formal in their services. I attend the high ones mostly. The chalices and patens in all of the high churches I've attended are even plainer than the very nice ones that Middletom has skillfully made. They always seem to be either silver or silverplated (I've never closely examined one for hallmarks or maker's marks) and spun into shape and at most might have a basic engraving of a cross on the side or maybe the Episcopal coat of arms. Sometimes the lid to the chalice might have a little simple cross for a finial but that is about all. I've never closely examined one by turning it over and looking for hallmarks or makers marks though. My experience has been limited to their being used for their intended purpose. I've noted though that the chalices all seem to have a gold wash inside so that the acid in the wine doesn't interact with the silver but that is just to make them functional rather than decorative. IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 04-29-2006 01:26 AM
When I was first dealing, the Catholic Church in Chicago was going through a housecleaning all over the system. So, I had the opportunity to handle and examine quite a few chalices. Generally they were made with a brass base with a gold plated interior. Some were silverplated on the outside. There were a number of jeweled ones. And some with inset enameled scenes. Also damascene work and some niello, as well as engraving. The quality of work was overall excellent. The one maker that seemed to predominate was called something like Atelier de Religieux Montreal. These bejewelled and decorated chalices were used. They frequently appeared in Eucharistic processions and liturgies, as well as in daily masses. Which may be a Chicago practice. Polish parishes in particular had spectacular chalices. The pieces that really fascinated me were the monstrances. One shop that, searching for the politically correct term, was an Appalachian white used furniture store had several dozen monstrances as well as chalices, thuribles, aspersoriums etc. for sale. Very strange place to find these. Prices were very high for the times. And the buyers were outraged parishoners who were grabbing them up. With the intention of re-giving them to their parish when the simplicity fad died down. To make a boring story short, ecclesiastical silver is something that seems not much researched. At least in the post 1837 era. Repeatedly, I have seen pyxes sold as spice boxes. And extreme unction kits as dresser items. There is a great deal of factory produced ecclesiastical ware, most very well made and nicely designed about which we know almost nothing. On a personal note, I find monstrances fascinating. The form lends itself to fabulous baroque extravagances. Totally awe inspiring design. IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 04-29-2006 10:36 AM
The buyers were outraged because in Catholic theology selling a blessed object is a serious sin, the sin of Simony. Tom IP: Logged |
Dale Posts: 2132 |
posted 04-29-2006 04:38 PM
I must apologize for an error on my part. The handled paten I was thinking of is actually a ciborum, not a paten. Sorry for any confusion. I have surfed around and found some church supply places that do offer silver items. As they are commercial sites, I feel I should not link to them. But there is some interesting silver out there. It appears that all sorts of church services require silver. And makers are creating some great items to fill that need. Thanks for the update Tom. Imagine, there are sins that don't involve sex. Who knew? In the sixties and early seventies RC churches went through a gigantic housecleaning. There was one auction with a great many pews, each ornately carved in memory of Sister so and so. A great quantity of RC silver appeared on the market at that time. Just wonder where it all went, as very little ever made it into the antique venues such as shops and shows and flea markets. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |