SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales


The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!

General Silver Forum



Silver Salon internal search
or

REGISTER (click here) How to Post Photos


customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  General Silver Forum
tline3open  mystery sugar sifter

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   mystery sugar sifter
rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 03-22-2006 10:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
[26-0968 01-2856]

The discussion of sugar in the coin silver forum reminded me of this sifter. I bought it a few years ago as a wedding present but found out that what was wanted was what I would have called a sugar castor or shaker. It wound up in my desk drawer by default. It is almost 6 inches long and the bowl is about 2 inches wide. It is heavy and sturdy enough that I would feel comfortable using the flat bottom to crush lumpy sugar to be scooped up and sifted onto my oatmeal.

I've only seen one other like it, English, heavy and plain, and the dealer said that it was made in the early 1800s. The "sterling" makes me feel confident that this is American. Since there is no sign of a mark and no place for one to hide, I concentrated on the laurel wreath engraving. I found a match on a teaspoon identified as Regal and clearly marked for the Newburyport Silver Company. Short-lived, early 1900s Keene, New Hampshire is all I know about them. Is anyone familiar with this silver company? Would they have sold un-trademarked silver? Is this a common form for an English sugar sifter?

IP: Logged

obnock

Posts: 27
Registered: Mar 2005

iconnumber posted 03-22-2006 02:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for obnock     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Whilst I have no great knowledge, I am certain I have never seen this type of handle on any English cutlery. One can often date English silver not only by the hallmarks but by the style of spoon handles from the early "acorn knop" through to the "rat tail" of the early 18th century and now the more common "kings, queens,fiddle and old English" which are still being produced today. I cannot identify your handle pattern from any of my reference books.

One thing that is noteworthy, the bowl and handle look to be joined/soldered, this is unusual for English sifters, there would usually be no obvious join.

I do like the quatrefoil sifter holes,this makes this spoon unusual.

IP: Logged

rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 03-22-2006 05:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm sure that you are right, obnock. I'm embarassed to say that I really don't remember the handle of the English sifter, other than that it had some sort of family crest engraved on it. The likeness to mine was in the heft of the piece and the angle of attachment of the handle to the bowl, but mostly in the flat bottom of the bowl. American pieces seem to have more deeply curved bowls and to be more ornate, less business-like, though I know from reading past threads on this subject that there is some difference of opinion on what constitutes a sugar sifter.

IP: Logged

Primroy

Posts: 42
Registered: Jan 2007

iconnumber posted 05-12-2007 12:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Primroy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have heard this handle shape called Celtic or English Pointed. I have an Old English (Were sugar sifters around in the 18th century? ) sifter dating to 1766 that also has a hefty handle, presumably for crushing sugar as you suggest.

IP: Logged

Ulysses Dietz
Moderator

Posts: 1265
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 05-14-2007 01:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ulysses Dietz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I cannot imagine using the bowl of any such thing to crush lumps of sugar...if you had a piece like this you would have had servants to crush the sugar for you.

You all sure this isn't a tea strainer?

IP: Logged

doc

Posts: 728
Registered: Jul 2003

iconnumber posted 05-14-2007 02:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for doc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Having spent some time on a replacement service website, it appears that your item is a separate pattern, not Regal, which is identified on this site as NEBS5. On the list of items offered in another Newburyport pattern, there is both a large and a small sugar sifter spoon (unfortunately, no sketch or photograph), so I think it is likely that this item is a sugar sifter.

IP: Logged

rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 05-15-2007 02:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ulysses, sometimes sugar needs to be beaten into submission at the point of use. My grandmother used her best sugar bowl only on special occasions. Since the bowl was covered, she didn't always change the sugar between times. That sugar was like cement. Luckily I never damaged bowl or spoon before I learned to drink unsweetened tea.

Thanks for the information, doc. And Primroy, I've enjoyed looking at the pictures and reading about your sifter.

IP: Logged

DB

Posts: 252
Registered: May 2006

iconnumber posted 05-15-2007 04:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
But sugar does dissolve in water, so no need to get brutal with your grandma's treasure.

IP: Logged

rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 05-15-2007 07:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It was almost impossible to get any sugar out, Dorothea. When I told one of my boys this story, he said that I should have just poured my tea into the sugar bowl and used it as a cup.

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices