|
The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993 Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !! General Silver Forum
|
REGISTER (click here) |
How to Post Photos
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
General Silver Forum New Government Ivory Rules Could Spell Trouble
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: New Government Ivory Rules Could Spell Trouble |
chicagosilver Posts: 227 |
posted 02-18-2014 03:35 PM
According to FACT SHEET: National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking & Commercial Ban on Trade in Elephant Ivory as of 2-11-14 the government is "announcing a ban on commercial trade of elephant ivory...by prohibiting the import, export, or resale within the United States of elephant ivory except in a very limited number of circumstances." The White House fact sheet goes on to say: "Today we are also announcing a ban on the commercial trade of elephant ivory, which will enhance our ability to protect elephants by prohibiting commercial imports, exports and domestic sale of ivory, with a very limited number of exceptions." and "We will finalize a proposed rule that will reaffirm and clarify that sales across state lines are prohibited, except for bona fide antiques, and will prohibit sales within a state unless the seller can demonstrate an item was lawfully imported prior to 1990 for African elephants and 1975 for Asian elephants, or under an exemption document." It defines "antique" as follows: "To qualify as an antique, an item must be more than 100 years old and meet other requirements under the Endangered Species Act. The onus will now fall on the importer, exporter, or seller to demonstrate that an item meets these criteria." Most silver tea sets have ivory insulators. A lot of other silver holloware and jewelry contains ivory. The White House says "sales across state lines are prohibited, except for bona fide antiques" but defines antiques as having to be over 100 years old. And it says the seller will now have to "to demonstrate that an item meets these criteria." I'm sure many of us are delighted that elephants are now being protected. But if antiques for cross-state sales can't include ivory unless sellers can prove to the government's satisfaction that it is 100 years old, and other restrictions on intra-state sales apply, this sounds like a real headache for sellers who have old pieces with old ivory. IP: Logged |
Kimo Posts: 1627 |
posted 02-18-2014 06:16 PM
Best estimates indicate that 22,000 elephants were killed in Africa in 2012 and a similar or larger number in 2013 is expected to be announced. There are a total of about 500,000 elephants left in Africa so at this rate in 22 years or less there will not be a single elephant left in Africa outside of the zoos. Elephant ivory sells for about $1,000 a pound in China and east Asian countries, and one tusk weighs between 200 and 250 pounds making killing elephants very profitable. Most individual poachers have been driven off and it is now organized crime and terrorist organizations that are conducting wholesale killings at watering holes using machine guns mounted on vehicles or aircraft. The bottom line is the problem has suddenly become extremely dire and the only way to address it is to devalue ivory to zero commercial value. It is going to be a difficult process as you mention. IP: Logged |
Richard Kurtzman Moderator Posts: 768 |
posted 02-18-2014 08:14 PM
The ivory trade is already outlawed As well intentioned as this may be, it will only affect and make life more difficult for those that obey the law. As long as there is a demand, and in Asia there is a tremendous demand, there will be those that will go to any lengths to fill it. Common sense would appear to be the main loser. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 02-18-2014 10:54 PM
This won't solve the problem, but it might slow it down a little. Much as I love antique silver tea sets (and you all know how VERY much I love them), they are not living, intelligent, endangered beings like elephants. The elephants are more important than the tea sets. IP: Logged |
chicagosilver Posts: 227 |
posted 02-19-2014 12:14 PM
Killing elephants for their tusks is genuinely horrible. But how does banning 80-year old antiques do anything but create huge problems for sellers and collectors (who bought their items legally and are now stuck with them)? It won't save one current elephant's life. Are pianos now banned? Ivory handles on things? Ivory jewelry? And what will happen next? Will they punish you if you move to another state and take along your old tea set or piano or grandma's necklace with an ivory bead on it? IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 02-19-2014 01:11 PM
African elephants are not the only ones killed for their ivory. Populations of several Asian/Asian Pacific elephants, although nominally protected are critically endangered through poaching. All the legal protection of African elephants has done little to stop the slaughter by poachers. Stopping the trade is the only way to make it unprofitable for them on the black market. IP: Logged |
Kimo Posts: 1627 |
posted 02-19-2014 01:36 PM
The proposed law does have a narrow exemption for historical ivory. There will be a burden of proof but if there is not then the problem will grow because someone can say a piece of ivory is old when it may not be. This continues driving the world market. The only solution is to make ivory valueless combined with more rigorous enforcement which is begining to happen. INTERPOL now has a wildlife crime division to go after the bad guys and from December 2013 through January 2014, law enforcement officers from 28 countries worked with them and conducted a ground-breaking, global operation to combat wildlife poaching and trafficking, code-named Operation Cobra II. In addition to training and increased coordination they made over 400 arrests of wildlife criminals and conducted 350 major wildlife seizures across Africa and Asia. Among the black market wildlife material they seized was over 3 tons of ivory and 200 tons of endangered rosewood. In my personal opinion and in light of the desperate situation I do not think that it is entirely unreasonable for collectors of antique silver that has ivory components to go through a basic process to document the age to get the exemption, and that when having pieces repaired or restored to use substitutes for real ivory that look as good but are not using actual ivory. [This message has been edited by Kimo (edited 02-21-2014).] IP: Logged |
chicagosilver Posts: 227 |
posted 02-19-2014 02:02 PM
Kimo, We're all 100% with you when it comes to protecting wildlife. Really. That's not the problem. The trouble is in dealing with well-intentioned laws that are impossibly hard to work with. For instance, you mentioned rosewood. Many guitars have rosewood parts. Here's what http://www.wood-database.com/ says about traveling with such a guitar: "...it is illegal to take such items across international borders without a proper export permit. If you believe that the wood or finished wood product was harvested/made before the date of the CITES listing, you still cannot legally travel with or export the wood unless you have written proof or other evidence that it was obtained before the listing date. If you have the required evidence, and are willing to pay a processing fee and wait 2-3 months for processing, then you may be eligible for a Pre-Convention Certificate." Have written proof? Wait 2-3 months? Pay a processing fee? So you MAY be eligible? Besides, what constitutes acceptable proof? How do you prove the items you acquired decades ago are acceptable to some bureaucrat? We're in total agreement about protecting living things. The issue is being forced to deal with onerous or even impossible requirements to transport or sell something you obtained legally before the law was in place. IP: Logged |
vathek Posts: 966 |
posted 02-20-2014 09:55 AM
This affects musicians as well. Many bows are mounted with ivory tips or frogs. Pianos have ivory keys, wind instruments may have ivory ferrules. There are some instances where people have had their antique instruments seized at customs and I believe in several instances ivory frogs have been destroyed. In addition many fine works of art were pre ban have been mindlessly destroyed. This is vandalism. Slaughter of elephants should be stopped but destroying older ivory pieces is inexcusable. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 04-01-2014 02:17 PM
From the big online auction site: quote: IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
posted 04-16-2014 12:09 AM
The talk in Atlanta this weekend was the large number of confiscations of ivory at the Round Top antique show in Texas. This weekend the dealers in Atlanta still had pieces with ivory for sale. I would not hazard a guess as to whether there was less for sale than usual as I normally don't look for ivory. Is does appear that antique ivory may soon be off the market. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 06-13-2015 08:51 AM
On this subject I remain confused as to what is fact, about to be fact and all the loop holes as well as who officially will make such determinations (what qualifications are used) when confiscating and destroying. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service has a page: And then there are all the state regulations like California's ivory ban bill - AB 96. Last year there were many reports of confiscations. Does this continue? What happens to the confiscated items? Is the seizure & any destruction of the property requiring some sort of legal trial? The more I read about this, the more questions I have. I'm all for saving endangered species, and for stopping the poaching & criminal trafficking (including "wink & a node" dealings) with all animal products. All of these good intended laws/regulations feels like a bunch of knee jerking. And would seem to only make things difficult for the uninformed buyer/seller while making the $ incentives for poaching & criminal trafficking all that more attractive. Commerce, regardless if it is technically legal or not, is what drives this. Making the market smaller and less attractive world seem to be better. So make the ownership/possession rules/regulations very clear. And when there is not clear ownership/possession and compliance with rules/regulations then make the penalties for the owner/possessor/seller very severe. The world needs to find a better way ... IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 06-13-2015 11:55 AM
Scott, I agree. The rules need to be made clear. At an antique show last year, I saw a high-end antique item described as having had its ivory elements replaced with faux ivory. I don't remember what the item was or what they used as a replacement. They wanted a ton of money for it; I have no idea whether they were asking more or less than they would have before the law, if it hadn't had its ivory replaced. I can imagine this working for items in which the ivory is isolated and in a simple form--say a teapot with small, plain ivory insulators--but not for something where the ivory is complexly worked, for example carved or inlaid. IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 06-14-2015 01:37 PM
A couple of years or so ago I had an antique microscope (>100 yrs) imported from England and held up in customs for a long period probably due to a couple of small ivory knobs (<1 cm) in its case. I don't know how they judged (or who they used to verify) its age. I would have been out big bucks had both the microscope and its case been confiscated. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |