SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales


The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!

General Silver Forum



Silver Salon internal search
or

REGISTER (click here) How to Post Photos


customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  General Silver Forum
tline3open  New Government Ivory Rules Could Spell Trouble

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   New Government Ivory Rules Could Spell Trouble
chicagosilver

Posts: 227
Registered: Aug 2005

iconnumber posted 02-18-2014 03:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chicagosilver     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
According to FACT SHEET: National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking & Commercial Ban on Trade in Elephant Ivory as of 2-11-14 the government is "announcing a ban on commercial trade of elephant ivory...by prohibiting the import, export, or resale within the United States of elephant ivory except in a very limited number of circumstances."

The White House fact sheet goes on to say: "Today we are also announcing a ban on the commercial trade of elephant ivory, which will enhance our ability to protect elephants by prohibiting commercial imports, exports and domestic sale of ivory, with a very limited number of exceptions."

and

"We will finalize a proposed rule that will reaffirm and clarify that sales across state lines are prohibited, except for bona fide antiques, and will prohibit sales within a state unless the seller can demonstrate an item was lawfully imported prior to 1990 for African elephants and 1975 for Asian elephants, or under an exemption document."

It defines "antique" as follows: "To qualify as an antique, an item must be more than 100 years old and meet other requirements under the Endangered Species Act. The onus will now fall on the importer, exporter, or seller to demonstrate that an item meets these criteria."

Most silver tea sets have ivory insulators. A lot of other silver holloware and jewelry contains ivory. The White House says "sales across state lines are prohibited, except for bona fide antiques" but defines antiques as having to be over 100 years old. And it says the seller will now have to "to demonstrate that an item meets these criteria."

I'm sure many of us are delighted that elephants are now being protected. But if antiques for cross-state sales can't include ivory unless sellers can prove to the government's satisfaction that it is 100 years old, and other restrictions on intra-state sales apply, this sounds like a real headache for sellers who have old pieces with old ivory.

IP: Logged

Kimo

Posts: 1627
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 02-18-2014 06:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kimo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Best estimates indicate that 22,000 elephants were killed in Africa in 2012 and a similar or larger number in 2013 is expected to be announced. There are a total of about 500,000 elephants left in Africa so at this rate in 22 years or less there will not be a single elephant left in Africa outside of the zoos. Elephant ivory sells for about $1,000 a pound in China and east Asian countries, and one tusk weighs between 200 and 250 pounds making killing elephants very profitable. Most individual poachers have been driven off and it is now organized crime and terrorist organizations that are conducting wholesale killings at watering holes using machine guns mounted on vehicles or aircraft.

The bottom line is the problem has suddenly become extremely dire and the only way to address it is to devalue ivory to zero commercial value. It is going to be a difficult process as you mention.

IP: Logged

Richard Kurtzman
Moderator

Posts: 768
Registered: Aug 2000

iconnumber posted 02-18-2014 08:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Kurtzman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The ivory trade is already outlawed

As well intentioned as this may be, it will only affect and make life more difficult for those that obey the law.

As long as there is a demand, and in Asia there is a tremendous demand, there will be those that will go to any lengths to fill it.

Common sense would appear to be the main loser.

IP: Logged

Polly

Posts: 1970
Registered: Nov 2004

iconnumber posted 02-18-2014 10:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Polly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This won't solve the problem, but it might slow it down a little. Much as I love antique silver tea sets (and you all know how VERY much I love them), they are not living, intelligent, endangered beings like elephants. The elephants are more important than the tea sets.

IP: Logged

chicagosilver

Posts: 227
Registered: Aug 2005

iconnumber posted 02-19-2014 12:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chicagosilver     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Killing elephants for their tusks is genuinely horrible. But how does banning 80-year old antiques do anything but create huge problems for sellers and collectors (who bought their items legally and are now stuck with them)? It won't save one current elephant's life. Are pianos now banned? Ivory handles on things? Ivory jewelry? And what will happen next? Will they punish you if you move to another state and take along your old tea set or piano or grandma's necklace with an ivory bead on it?

IP: Logged

swarter
Moderator

Posts: 2920
Registered: May 2003

iconnumber posted 02-19-2014 01:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swarter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
African elephants are not the only ones killed for their ivory. Populations of several Asian/Asian Pacific elephants, although nominally protected are critically endangered through poaching. All the legal protection of African elephants has done little to stop the slaughter by poachers. Stopping the trade is the only way to make it unprofitable for them on the black market.

IP: Logged

Kimo

Posts: 1627
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 02-19-2014 01:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kimo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The proposed law does have a narrow exemption for historical ivory. There will be a burden of proof but if there is not then the problem will grow because someone can say a piece of ivory is old when it may not be. This continues driving the world market. The only solution is to make ivory valueless combined with more rigorous enforcement which is begining to happen. INTERPOL now has a wildlife crime division to go after the bad guys and from December 2013 through January 2014, law enforcement officers from 28 countries worked with them and conducted a ground-breaking, global operation to combat wildlife poaching and trafficking, code-named Operation Cobra II. In addition to training and increased coordination they made over 400 arrests of wildlife criminals and conducted 350 major wildlife seizures across Africa and Asia. Among the black market wildlife material they seized was over 3 tons of ivory and 200 tons of endangered rosewood.

In my personal opinion and in light of the desperate situation I do not think that it is entirely unreasonable for collectors of antique silver that has ivory components to go through a basic process to document the age to get the exemption, and that when having pieces repaired or restored to use substitutes for real ivory that look as good but are not using actual ivory.

[This message has been edited by Kimo (edited 02-21-2014).]

IP: Logged

chicagosilver

Posts: 227
Registered: Aug 2005

iconnumber posted 02-19-2014 02:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chicagosilver     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Kimo, We're all 100% with you when it comes to protecting wildlife. Really. That's not the problem. The trouble is in dealing with well-intentioned laws that are impossibly hard to work with. For instance, you mentioned rosewood. Many guitars have rosewood parts. Here's what http://www.wood-database.com/ says about traveling with such a guitar: "...it is illegal to take such items across international borders without a proper export permit. If you believe that the wood or finished wood product was harvested/made before the date of the CITES listing, you still cannot legally travel with or export the wood unless you have written proof or other evidence that it was obtained before the listing date. If you have the required evidence, and are willing to pay a processing fee and wait 2-3 months for processing, then you may be eligible for a Pre-Convention Certificate."

Have written proof? Wait 2-3 months? Pay a processing fee? So you MAY be eligible? Besides, what constitutes acceptable proof? How do you prove the items you acquired decades ago are acceptable to some bureaucrat?

We're in total agreement about protecting living things. The issue is being forced to deal with onerous or even impossible requirements to transport or sell something you obtained legally before the law was in place.

IP: Logged

vathek

Posts: 966
Registered: Jun 99

iconnumber posted 02-20-2014 09:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vathek     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This affects musicians as well. Many bows are mounted with ivory tips or frogs. Pianos have ivory keys, wind instruments may have ivory ferrules. There are some instances where people have had their antique instruments seized at customs and I believe in several instances ivory frogs have been destroyed. In addition many fine works of art were pre ban have been mindlessly destroyed. This is vandalism. Slaughter of elephants should be stopped but destroying older ivory pieces is inexcusable.

IP: Logged

Scott Martin
Forum Master

Posts: 11520
Registered: Apr 93

iconnumber posted 04-01-2014 02:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scott Martin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From the big online auction site:
quote:

scrimshander2
Author

THE LAWS OF IVORY The Truth of Buying and Owning It
May 4, 2010

The biggest misconception that we hear or read about is that "all ivory is ILLEGAL to own, buy or sell". If you believe this statement then I will be selling a beautiful bridge, located in New York, on EBAY next week... no reserve! In the next few paragraphs I have put together a simple summary of the INTERNATIONAL and U.S.FISH & WILDLIFE laws which regulate the commerce of ivory, which in turn is regulated by C.I.T.E.S. (Convention on the International Trade in endangered Species) and the 'Marine Mammal Protection Act'. C.I.T.E.S. is an organization that was formed in 1973 as a multinational protege of the United Nations to meet every 2 years to review data and set quotas to maintain levels of protection on species of both plant and animal. Here's what they say on regulation of ivories:

AFRICAN ELEPHANT: This is on the C.I.T.E.S. endangered species list. The importation, selling and buying of this ivory IS NOT ALLOWED INTERNATIONALLY. It cannot be exported or imported to the U.S. and most of the countries delegated to the U.N., BUT... it is LEGAL TO OWN, SELL, BUY, or SHIP within the boundaries of the U.S. and there are NO PERMITS or REGISTRATION requirements! *The majority of african elephant ivory is "old estate" ivory that was brought into this country since its' inception.

ASIAN ELEPHANT : Also on the C.I.T.E.S. Endangered species list and is ILLEGAL to buy, trade, sell, import or export anywhere internationally or INTERSTATE within the U.S.

MAMMOTH/MASTEDON: These are two distinctively different animals for one thing but the ivory is difficult to distinguish between the two. These mammals are extinct and were on this earth 10 to 40,000 years ago so this ivory is COMPLETELY UNRESTRICTED! Distinguishing the difference between Mammoth/Mastedon ivory and Elephant ivory is determined by the angles where the cross grain lines bisect each other. Angles greater than 120% indicate elephant ivory and angles less than 90% indicate Mammoth/Mastedon ivory. Other distinctions include the color of the inner layers of the ivory and the outer layer referred to as the 'bark'.

HIPPO/WARTHOG: These species are protected but not endangered. Because of over population and a danger to humans, these animals are legally hunted by regulation for 'cull' purposes. Permits and documentation are required for importing or exporting this ivory but once it is in the U.S., NO PERMITS OR DOCUMENTS ARE NECESSARY to buy or sell interstate.

SPERM WHALE: An endangered species and regulated since 1973 by The Marine Mammal Protection Act. NO IMPORTATION/EXPORTATION PERIOD! Interstate sales of REGISTERED PRE-ACT teeth with SCRIMSHAW is allowed under a special Federal Permit. Unregistered pre-act teeth can NO LONGER BE REGISTERED and CANNOT BE TRANSPORTED across interstate lines for commercial purposes. THEY CAN BE SOLD 'INTRASTATE' so long as STATE LAW does not prohibit it!

ANTIQUE (100 YRS +) Scrimshaw Teeth can be sold Interstate.

BOWHEAD WHALE: Protected Period! It is LEGAL TO SELL via an exemption allowing ESKIMOS to hunt whales and then sell their crafts made from them.

WALRUS: They have been regulated since 1972 under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and reguated by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. The ivory that pre-dates the 12-21-1972 Law which bears the Alaska State walrus registration tags or post-law ivory that HAS BEEN CARVED OR SCRIMSHAWED BY AN ALASKAN NATIVE (Eskimo) is legal to buy , sell, and own. Any ivory that was/is obtained after 12-21-1972 IS NOT LEGAL TO BUY OR SELL UNLESS" both parties are Eskimo... BUT, it is LEGAL TO OWN. Permits are required(as to the laws above) to export the ivory out of the U.S.

FOSSIL WALRUS IVORY: No restictions. It is LEGAL TO BUY, SELL AND OWN anywhere in the U.S. The exportation of this ivory DOES require a permit.

THE ABOVE INCLUDES ANY AND ALL PARTS OF SUCH ANIMALS STATED


IP: Logged

ahwt

Posts: 2334
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 04-16-2014 12:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ahwt     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The talk in Atlanta this weekend was the large number of confiscations of ivory at the Round Top antique show in Texas.
This weekend the dealers in Atlanta still had pieces with ivory for sale. I would not hazard a guess as to whether there was less for sale than usual as I normally don't look for ivory. Is does appear that antique ivory may soon be off the market.

IP: Logged

Scott Martin
Forum Master

Posts: 11520
Registered: Apr 93

iconnumber posted 06-13-2015 08:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scott Martin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
On this subject I remain confused as to what is fact, about to be fact and all the loop holes as well as who officially will make such determinations (what qualifications are used) when confiscating and destroying. eek

The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service has a page:
USFWS Moves to Ban Commercial Elephant Ivory Trade
Questions & Answers

And then there are all the state regulations like California's ivory ban bill - AB 96.

Last year there were many reports of confiscations. Does this continue? What happens to the confiscated items? Is the seizure & any destruction of the property requiring some sort of legal trial?

The more I read about this, the more questions I have.

I'm all for saving endangered species, and for stopping the poaching & criminal trafficking (including "wink & a node" dealings) with all animal products. All of these good intended laws/regulations feels like a bunch of knee jerking. And would seem to only make things difficult for the uninformed buyer/seller while making the $ incentives for poaching & criminal trafficking all that more attractive.

Commerce, regardless if it is technically legal or not, is what drives this. Making the market smaller and less attractive world seem to be better. So make the ownership/possession rules/regulations very clear. And when there is not clear ownership/possession and compliance with rules/regulations then make the penalties for the owner/possessor/seller very severe.

The world needs to find a better way ... eek


IP: Logged

Polly

Posts: 1970
Registered: Nov 2004

iconnumber posted 06-13-2015 11:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Polly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Scott, I agree. The rules need to be made clear.

At an antique show last year, I saw a high-end antique item described as having had its ivory elements replaced with faux ivory. I don't remember what the item was or what they used as a replacement. They wanted a ton of money for it; I have no idea whether they were asking more or less than they would have before the law, if it hadn't had its ivory replaced.

I can imagine this working for items in which the ivory is isolated and in a simple form--say a teapot with small, plain ivory insulators--but not for something where the ivory is complexly worked, for example carved or inlaid.

IP: Logged

swarter
Moderator

Posts: 2920
Registered: May 2003

iconnumber posted 06-14-2015 01:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swarter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A couple of years or so ago I had an antique microscope (>100 yrs) imported from England and held up in customs for a long period probably due to a couple of small ivory knobs (<1 cm) in its case. I don't know how they judged (or who they used to verify) its age. I would have been out big bucks had both the microscope and its case been confiscated.

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices