|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
20th/21st Century Silversmiths Shiebler or Frank W Smith?
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Shiebler or Frank W Smith? |
Plat unregistered |
posted 05-27-2003 11:12 PM
We have a sterling spoon with a marker's mark that could be either Shiebler or Frank W Smith. While the mark is not crisp, I see both feathers and a small crown above the S, which make me think it is Shiebler. However is isn't completely clear. Using both Hagan's book and Noel D Turner's "American Silver Flatware 1837-1910", we can not find a documented pattern that exactly match to this piece. Looking at Frank W Smith patterns, I don't see any blanks (teaspoon shape) with the top like this one -(oval and asymmetrical). That is another reason I'm thinking it isn't a FW Smith. I also don't see any documentation on multi-motif patterns for F. W Smith either, so it doesn't look like they made versions of their patterns..... Looking at Shiebler, the overall style is much more consistent with other Shiebler blanks. Shiebler did have multi-motif patterns documented. It might be a multi-motif version of Shiebler's "Victoria" The only other patterns that I see that seems to be in the same blank style (again, oval top/asymmetrical style) are F.M Whiting Co - George III (1891). George III is quite honestly, the best documented match of the patterns, but the maker's mark doesn't correspond to Whiting. Any opinions? Shiebler or Frank W? Thanks.
IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 05-28-2003 03:46 PM
I am sure we have some of this pattern tucked away.... I just can't remember if there is pattern name??? Any one else? The mark definitely looks like a poorly struck Frank Smith mark. Here is a mark from an Frank Smith Earle pattern spoon (cira 1890): From our book The Book of Silver marks section: IP: Logged |
Anuh Posts: 190 |
posted 08-23-2003 08:34 PM
The real problem, as I see it, is that it also carries the Duhme & Co. mark. Duhme & Co. also produced sterling flatware with their own patterns. It could be a case of Duhme having another company actually produce the flatware with their own mark under contract, although the little I read of them doesn't indicate they normally did this. OR, the originating company could have made the pattern and sold it to Duhme for marketing. In either event, I would look under Duhme & Co. first, then consider other sources. BTW, why do you think it might be multi-motif? ------------------ IP: Logged |
Bob and Carol Carnighan Posts: 63 |
posted 08-23-2003 11:10 PM
This is not Shiebler. Victoria is not multi-motif. We believe that this was incorrectly listed as Shiebler on Ebay several weeks ago. Give us more information. IP: Logged |
Paul Lemieux Posts: 1792 |
posted 08-24-2003 06:28 PM
Duhme is just the retailer, and it is definitely a Frank Smith spoon as Scott said earlier. Even if it the Frank Smith mark was totally illegible, the bowl shape (it is a citrus spoon) is specific to FS. I haven't checked, but it sounds like this pattern is not shown in Turner or Hagan. So I would guess that it is just one of many not-full-line (only made in one or a few pieces) patterns produced in America during the Victorian era. It seems like citrus spoons, demitasse spoons, cocktail forks, etc. were especially popular in not full line patterns. Probably sets of a dozen were popular gifts so manufacturers offered a wide array of designs in addition to their regular full line patterns. Gorham alone probably produced scores of designs specifically for demitasse spoon sets. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |