|
A GLOSSARY of MILLED BANDS
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
American Silver before sterling Unmarked FP Soup Ladle Attribution?
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Unmarked FP Soup Ladle Attribution? |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-14-2003 03:02 PM
Hi! I've been looking for a British Georgian and corresponding American period flatware discussion group, and luckily stumbled across this site when searching "Hanoverian spoon" on the Yahoo search engine. I have recently acquired an American fiddle pattern 13" coin silver soup ladle, approx. 6 oz., and would like to try to attribute it (I know, GOOD LUCK!!!). Here are the pics: There are no maker's or retailer's marks at all, it's completely unmarked except for the mono. It is collared, and there is no protruding drop at the base of the stem. I realize that "everyone and a dog" has made the general pattern, and so this may likely be a fruitless search. A cursory review has identified similar style ladles by J. Shoemaker and R&H (Phila.), B.H. Tisdale (Providence, R.I), and Chas. Gennett (Richmond, VA), primarily in the long "paddle" portion of the handle with nearly parallel sides (and no drop in the last example). There may indeed be a Southern connection, in that a gravy ladle recently sold on Ebay (#2524014335) with a nearly identical mono, same initials, same style, very possibly by the same hand at about the same time. Here's a pic of the matching mono on the W.GREGG marked gravy ladle:
I realize that trying to identify engravers is even more thankless than trying to attribute unmarked FP ladles! And it doesn't appear by style that Gregg made my unmarked ladle. But in view of the mono connection, perhaps my soup ladle was bought locally from another maker in the same vicinity as Gregg. Unfortunately, it appears that Gregg worked in about four different cities, one of them in the North, and so for the mono to help, I should know when/where Gregg made the gravy ladle with the matching mono. Dead end? Anyway, perhaps a good mystery for those inclined. Any info would be appreciated, either specific to this piece, or in general (such as a good text on early coin silver flatware styles?). Thanks! Oh, by the way, I'm using the Inkfrog server to post the images, and so they are supposed to disappear in ten days (5/24/03). Again, TIA for any and all help!!! Rick IP: Logged |
wev Moderator Posts: 4121 |
posted 05-14-2003 10:44 PM
Lovely ladle and an intriguing question. The monograms sure look like the same hand to me, but what are we to deduce? Done at the time and location of Gregg? At the time and location of the ladle, whoever the maker may be? Or some other time and place altogether? I think, at best, all that can be done is note the second piece in your records for now and see else may turn up. ps: I have loaded your images to my server, so they will remain with the post. [This message has been edited by wev (edited 05-14-2003).] IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 05-15-2003 09:05 AM
I think Rick is overly pessimistic about identifying the maker of the ladle, or at least the area in which it was made. There are many variations of the fiddle pattern some not only connected with a region but also with an individual silversmith. I know this doesn't mean anything to someone who doesn't handle a lot of Ky. silver but Hickman made silver that is easily recognized without looking at the mark. There are of course others. My immediate reaction to this ladle is that it is KY. The long straight part of the handle is usually associated with Ky, OH, & Mo ladles. The differences are often so subtle, recognizing a state of origin, is more of an art than a science. It is especially difficult from a picture. Wm. Greg apprenticed in Lexington, KY at the same approximate date of your ladle. I don't know if he produced any silver there and don't have any examples in my files. Now that digital photography makes taking pictures so simple perhaps we will see more attributions by engraving. Maurice IP: Logged |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-15-2003 02:21 PM
Thank you wev and larbarbedor. Re the alternate hypotheses you pose, wev, you are correct, your alternatives are perhaps as likely as my original, but they don't yield as much useful information for me to go on. Consider, I can
b. Begin a search of all Southern smiths, or c. Search all smiths working in all the towns in which W. Gregg was known to work, or d. Search the smiths working in or near the town in which Gregg likely made the ladle with the matching engraving. Rick B. IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 05-16-2003 03:41 AM
This really is a knotty problem. Despite the indications, I am afraid you may be spinning your wheels looking for a Kentucky origin for your ladle, provided the engraving on the two pieces is original to them. According to published information, William Gregg was born in Virginia, was sent to Kentucky to apprentice with Asa Blanchard, and returned to Virginia upon completing that apprenticeship. There is no indication that he ever worked independently in Kentucky, and I believe it was not customary for apprentices to mark their work with their own names. It was not uncommon, however, for smiths who moved to other areas to continue to produce at least some work in the regional or individual styles they were accustomed to. Certainly the Ohio Valley has produced some unique handle styles, but even though this particular less extreme style of handle might be thought to occur with greater frequency in the Ohio Valley, it could have been made elsewhere, as you have noted. Accordingly, I think Virginia is your best bet, if you still wish to pursue this, followed by South Carolina, where he moved after a few years in Virginia. You are right to consider the engraving - a number of years ago I published a tentative attribution of an IW mark to Isaac Woodcock based in large part on engraving - an attribution for which I have since found further substantiation, so I would never discount it. I think that in this case the engraving may be your best lead, again provided that it is original to both pieces - unfortunately the ebay page for the signed ladle is no longer available for inspection(I probably saw it, but I have little or no recollection of how closely it might have resembled your ladle in shape and proportion, butif it were stylistically out of place I might have noticed and remembered). If you saved a printout, you might try contacting the buyer about any possible removals - for all I can tell from your photos, I see no obvious signs of removals of earlier initials. The reason this engraving is potentially useful is that it is rather atypical of the style which most engravers of the period followed - there is none of the customary feathering, the joining of the C and P is unusual, and even the formation of the P seems a bit off. Clearly, the two are by the same hand. My impression is that, even though the strokes seem strong and sure (not amateurish), the engraver may have been unfamiliar with the prevailing style and/or, if contemporary, did not have access to the style book(s) that were commonly relied upon for examples to copy (hence Virginia for a beginner, rather than South Carolina by which time he had more experience). Nonetheless, it might be productive to search for other examples of Gregg's work to compare - I can make nothing of the engraving from the illustrated spoons in Burton and Ripley (South Carolina Silversmiths). Parenthetically, I have also examined several examples of Asa Blanchard's work, plus photos in Boultinghouse (Kentucky Silversmiths) and find no similarity to that on yours - most of Blanchard's products carry the conventional form, albeit with the feathering often somewhat on the sparse side. One would think an apprentice would learn from his master how to "do it right." There are several possible reasons for a piece being unsigned, and your suggestion of a different maker may not be off the mark - trade pieces were ofter supplied to other silversmiths for retailing and may not have been marked by the seller, so that there still could have been a common source for the purchaser of both pieces (again, this requires originality of the engraving). Then, again . . . . If the engraving is not original, then all bets are off, and the two may have no relation other than common ownership at some later time. As I said, this is a knotty problem, and maybe we are making more of this than we should. As you are finding out (if you didn't already know it) there are often more questions than answers in American silver (and you did ask a few yourself), so don't let all the conflicting advice and lack of hard information discourage you - look on it as a challenge rather than a constant stream of frustrations. So, if you have other irons in the fire, you might want to take the moderator's advice and not spend too much time worrying this bone -- just bury it and dig it up again later. Have fun, and good luck. IP: Logged |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-16-2003 11:53 PM
Thank you again, swarter, for your reply (you also helped quite a bit on my Hanoverian spoon on the other list). I'm sorry the auction listing reference has gone south. However, there is yet another link to Gregg via engraving. The following is another Ebay auction of a W.GREGG gravy ladle, won by the same buyer as the first I referenced (I have contacted the buyer, but she hasn't gotten back to me with any opinion as of yet). Here's the info: quote: I will try to post the pic of the second Gregg ladle engraving later. Looking at the engraving on the second Gregg ladle on the Ebay listing above, the initials are mostly different from mine and the first Gregg ladle, and the engraving is more ornate, but the basic style is the same. Look at the weird "P" (or "T"?), the last initial, and compare it to the last initial on my ladle and the first Gregg ladle. They are the same initial in the same basic style, apparently a style peculiar to one or a small set of engravers who did work on Gregg ladles. Obviously, this similarity is not as strong a factor as the matching mono's, but it still points toward a localization of my piece with the Gregg ladles at some point in time, hopefully when they were all first purchased. But, as you have noted, Gregg worked in a number of different towns. It would certainly help if I could identify the town(s) in which these two Gregg ladles were made. Thank you once more for the respectable amount of time and thought you have given me, and please respond if you come up with any other ideas. Rick IP: Logged |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-17-2003 02:13 AM
Thanks, wev, for posting the pics of the second Gregg ladle. BTW, the first Gregg ladle is actually still at auction with all the pics, if you want to check the overall style, swarter (likely won't be there long, though). Here's the info: quote: But neither Gregg ladle appears to be a good stylistic match to mine, which sports a relatively long, narrow spatulate end of the handle with sides nearly parallel, connected by a relatively short narrow portion of the handle showing strong curvature at both ends of this section, plus rounded, chamfered collars at the base, and no drop. Definitely not in the mainstream of style. But who was the adventurist? Oh, well, I'm starting to chase my tail in circles now. What was that advice you gave me? Oh, yes, go out and bury the ladle and wait for something to pop up. Consider it done!!! Rick IP: Logged |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-17-2003 12:36 PM
Thanks, Scott, for snagging the Gregg ladle pics and descriptions off Ebay. Upon re-reading them on your list, I saw the attribution in one of them to Columbia, SC. I must have missed reading this originally on Ebay. Boy, am I embarrassed (see red faced smiley at head of this missive)! But I certainly appreciate the fine input I've gotten from all responders. I now have a path to follow, from SC to VA to KY and the Ohio valley. Now, how to find the correct texts/references? Burton and Ripley (South Carolina Silversmiths) and Boultinghouse (Kentucky Silversmiths) have been mentioned, but without success for untying this knot. Any suggestions for other good texts with numerous photo depictions would be well appreciated. Rick IP: Logged |
wev Moderator Posts: 4121 |
posted 05-17-2003 12:58 PM
Here, from Silversmiths of Virginia by George Cutten, is a very similar ladle made by Armstrong Truslow, working in Lynchburg c 1813-1830.
IP: Logged |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-17-2003 10:17 PM
Thanks, wev, looks close in the shape of the handle and of the bowl. Can't see the collar or the drop (or lack thereof), but what is visible matches nicely. Rick IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 05-17-2003 11:41 PM
Herewith another example, this one an outstanding 10 1/2" punch ladle from Philadelphia by John Owen, Jr., w. 1804-31, with two pouring lips. For the purpose of proportions, consider only the length of the stem above the shoulders (your "collar"?), disregarding the split shank below, and also note that the end of the handle has a somewhat pronounced down curve. Both these features make the handle appear shorter and the stem longer.
IP: Logged |
rick@slocoast.net unregistered |
posted 05-18-2003 06:26 PM
Thanks, swarter, for the additional pics, but now you're pointing North! Don't confuse me with the facts!!! Yup, I've seen similar styles from some other Phila. smiths, also one from Rhode Island. May be impossible to attribute this from photos with any feeling of surety. As an alternative, who has the expertise, holding the ladle in hand, to positively attribute it, where is he/she, and what does he/she charge? May be simpler, and cheaper to boot! ;o) Rick IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 05-18-2003 08:48 PM
I've enjoyed this exchange, Rick, but I think it's time to put this old dog to bed. Earlier in the 19th Century there were a few idiosyncratic style variations that can be traced to one individual or family, and some regional specialties like the shield-shaped handles on spoons from the Louisville area, or the "double-swell fiddles" from New England, that are prettty well definitive, but most can only be given a percentage of chance to be tied to any particular location. What this can do is to point you in a particular direction so that you might know where you would have the best chance of finding a match for an unidentified mark with a name of a silversmith, but to find a home for an unmarked piece that could have been made in any number of places you would need provenence (a history of ownership), a healthy dose of intuition, or just pure dumb luck (like a match of an idiosyncratic engraving style). I chose the Philadelphia piece for a reason, as it shows one reason why a style common in one place may be expected to be made somewhere else: A study of regional styles and transportation patterns in the early 19th Century shows that Philadelphia, before the advent of the railroads, was the ultimate source for southern and midwestern forms, which became more and more distinctive as they were carried from place to place with settlers migrating from Philadelphia either downcoast along the Atlantic, or west along the National Road and/or by canal ultimately into the midwest, or by way of Pittsburgh down the Ohio River, up the Missouri River, or down the Mississippi River through the South and ultimately the Gulf states. After the railroads arrived, all bets were off, since importing from major industrial centers became more economical, and local silversmithing beame a thing of the past. So after about 1840 you can largely forget about the name of a local silversmith meaning he was anything but a retailer. Persistence may ultimately pay off for you, but don't lose any sleep doggedly pursuing leads that might never lead anywhere but to more frustration. IP: Logged |
nihontochicken Posts: 289 |
posted 05-19-2003 05:28 PM
Yup, this horse is dead, time to stop kicking. Thanks, swarter and all, for your help. Very informative. If lightning strikes and I get a believable attribution, I'll be sure to post it here. Thanks again, over and out! Rick P.S. - Have registered for these forums as "nihontochicken". Don't ask, it's a long story! IP: Logged |
nihontochicken Posts: 289 |
posted 05-19-2003 08:35 PM
P.S. - I have a question re spoon pattern development c.1800 or so in the US as opposed to Britain, relating to the development of the Fiddle (Oar) Pattern. Since I have beaten this board up enough, I posted it on the General Silver Forum. But Coinies likely have as much knowledge on this as do the Brit-o-philes. Take a look if at all interested. Rick IP: Logged |
nihontochicken Posts: 289 |
posted 06-08-2003 09:52 PM
Just came across the following: AXF Shepherd, 1815, Kentucky Robt. Frazier, Paris/Lexington, KY
Rick IP: Logged |
nihontochicken Posts: 289 |
posted 03-24-2005 06:19 PM
I still haven't identified the maker of this ladle, and likely never will, but have noticed that this peculiar style of fiddle pattern appears to be over-represented in somewhat "out-of-the-way" places for early nineteenth century silver production. It seems that this sub-style followed the Great Philadelphia Wagon Road west and south to Virginia and hence through the Carolinas down to Georgia, plus the westward offshoots to Kentucky and Ohio. Of course, all styles likely followed the same route, but this peculiar pattern seems to have more than held its own in the competition. Since this migration path was heavily German and Scot-Irish, I would guess that it was the Scottish oar-pattern tradition that carried this sub-style along. The Great Philadelphia Wagon Road (same as the National Road mentioned previously above?) may be old hat to some, but this important early migration path wasn't included in my schooling. My recent discovery of it explains a lot. For those who are interested a lot more is available; just "Google" the Great Philadelphia Wagon Road. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |