SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!
American Silver before sterling Forum

A GLOSSARY of MILLED BANDS
Past American Coin Silver Forum topics/threads worth a look
WEV's American Silversmith's Family Tree Project Smith's Index

How to Post Photos REGISTER (click here)

customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  American Silver before sterling
tline3open  Moulton spoons

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Moulton spoons
doc

Posts: 728
Registered: Jul 2003

iconnumber posted 12-01-2003 02:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for doc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I purchased a pair of large serving spoons with a mark for William Moulton IV. The spoons are extremely heavy, and it makes me think they are sterling, rather than coin, but I have not seen any work by Moulton in anything other than coin. Can anyone shed light on this?

I can send a photo later, if helpful.

IP: Logged

swarter
Moderator

Posts: 2920
Registered: May 2003

iconnumber posted 12-01-2003 03:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swarter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think the weight of the piece is more a reflection of the amount of metal used, rather than the composition -- there is only 2.5% less silver in coin than sterling, and then you have to add back the weight of the small amounts of additional copper and other metals in the alloy, so there is probably not enough of a differnce to detect by handling two pieces of equal size and thickness. You may be influenced by an observation that so many later Moulton spoons are so light in weight, but they are also light in construction to the point of being flimsy - probably a cost-saving practice in a heavily competitive environment. A wealthy client could afford - and demand - more substantial construction.

I do not mean this to sound critical of the question, but I have a kind of heretical view of silver content in American silver: since so much Early American silver prior to the formal adoption of the coin and sterling standards was made from remelted silver of varied standards, there was no "refining control" applied, and silver content of objects varied widely; I feel that, for reasons other than academic curiosity, there is really nothing to be gained by trying to "reassay" a peice so long after it was made.

That said, there is always spectroscopy, but is it worth the expense? It is said that sterling has a whiter color, and that coin silver has a bluish cast, but this also depends on how much pure silver has been deposited on the surface in the "pickling" process. It would be necessary to file a groove to get below the surface for chenmical testing, and this only mars the piece -- so is it worth it? I think not. Why not just admire the workmanship and enjoy the piece for what it represents - the hand-made product of a skilled workman of time past?

[This message has been edited by swarter (edited 12-01-2003).]

IP: Logged

FredZ

Posts: 1070
Registered: Jun 99

iconnumber posted 12-01-2003 05:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FredZ     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The silver quality in a early American spoon is mostly a superfluous since we are talking about less than a few dollars difference. I have never considered the intrinsic metal value as a method of deciding worth.

Fred

IP: Logged

doc

Posts: 728
Registered: Jul 2003

iconnumber posted 12-02-2003 08:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for doc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thank you both for your responses. I was not interested in the relative value-swarter is correct, I was influenced by the fact that other Moulton pieces I have seen have been much thinner and more delicate, and these are actually the heaviest pieces I have owned or seen. I plan on enjoying them greatly!

IP: Logged

vathek

Posts: 966
Registered: Jun 99

iconnumber posted 12-02-2003 08:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vathek     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The gauge of the silver could be dependent on the wealth of the patron who wanted more substantial pieces. I've seen Bateman teapots that were paper thin, and others quite heavy. Depends I guess on how much the purchaser wanted to spend and the quality they wanted.

IP: Logged

labarbedor

Posts: 353
Registered: Jun 2002

iconnumber posted 12-04-2003 12:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for labarbedor     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was thinking some time ago when preparing a lecture about silver, in general, to be delivered to a group of ladies. Almost any statement about silver one can make has an exception. While I would rarely disagree with any opinion expressed by the members who have weighed in above, there are always exceptions. I will look up an interesting comparison I once read concerning the difference in American and British silver, but right now I would like to mention some silver I pieces I have or have seen. One was a spoon by a early 19th century Phila. silversmith. It is such a low grade of silver it is actually rather yellow. At first I thought it was a case of a cheating silversmith selling a low grade of silver on the sly. But then some years later I ran into a tea set c. 1800 that belonged to one of Washington's generals. It also was of noticeably lower grade silver. While I could only test the surface with acid and take a guess, I think both would test well below .700 fine silver. The answer would probably not lie in a cheating silversmith, but a cheap buyer. I doubt anyone would cheat a general, by selling a noticeably lower grade silver. However if a client brings in a certain amount of silver (insuficient for the purpose)to make a tea set of a certain weight, what else could a silversmith do but make something of a lower grade silver. After all everyone doesn't care about whether silver is .800 .900 .925 or .950 (that Roadshow appraiser Boos comes to mind). But seriously, one of the most expensive (and finest in the sense of history and art) pieces of silver I have is of lower grade (French second standard) silver.

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices