|
A GLOSSARY of MILLED BANDS
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
American Silver before sterling Joseph Richardson
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Joseph Richardson |
Mefecit@aol.com unregistered |
posted 03-07-2004 11:23 AM
Hello: I am a metalsmith in Shepherdstown WV. One of my clients has a "peace medal" made for the Treaty of Greenville in 1795. The form is a gorget or "lunette" with chased and engraved designs and a makers mark of "JR" in an oval. The 1795 date would make Joseph Richardson in Philadelphia the maker. There are some things that are not "right" about this piece, including the mark. My books have drawings, not photos, of the mark, and the form of letter is not a match to any of the listed ones. So do you have a good high res photo of a Richardson mark? IP: Logged |
wev Moderator Posts: 4121 |
posted 03-07-2004 11:35 AM
Both made trade and Indian pieces; both have been forged for many years. Some are quite sophisticated; some ludicrous. Can you post images of the piece and its mark? IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 03-07-2004 12:16 PM
It would be helpful if you could obtain and post photographs of the medal and the mark. Although the corners of a worn rectangle could be rounded to some degree, I am aware of no published photos of a Joseph Jr. mark in a truly oval reserve - all that I know of are rectangular, and his letter forms are quite consistent. Joseph Jr. apparently made quite a number of these medals; Richardson marks have been forged, and there are also spurious medals known - Martha Gandy Fales illustrates two genuine Richardson medals of different design, plus one forgery in her Early American Silver, along with her discussion of forgeries in American silver, which should be required reading for all dealers and collectors. IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 03-08-2004 11:23 PM
I hope you know that the vast majority of these Indian Trade pieces are fake, especially Richardson pieces, even some in museums. The odds against it being real are about 1 in 100,000, about the differnce in value between a fake and a real one. IP: Logged |
Mefecit@aol.com unregistered |
posted 03-09-2004 05:25 PM
Hello again: Back with some scans of the peace medal. The list of things I found odd about this piece are:
What I have been asked to do is find out if this is "real," and I just have not seen that much "Trade silver." Ideas? Thanks for the help,
IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 03-09-2004 06:21 PM
This is a gorget, intended to be worn around the neck, and not a peace medal. The mark is not that of Richardson, and does not look genuine. The lettering does not look "period," and the treaty was signed at Grenville, not Greenville. If the gorget itself is not genuine, as I suspect, then the surface has been artificially aged and the pitting is an attempt to simulate corrosion and make it look as if it had been dug up after being buried for some time. [This message has been edited by swarter (edited 03-09-2004).] IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 03-10-2004 12:21 AM
I take no pleasure in this, but honesty is the best policy. Swarter is right as usual (or maybe always). I am 56 years old, and I guarantee I am older than this gorget. The shape, engraving, mark, etc are all wrong. I would like to suggest something to everyone. About 25 years ago I started to point out what was wrong with these fakes. I no longer do that. I started finding the mistakes were being corrected. This is a public forum, even fakers can find it. I made a very bad fake as an experiment 15 years ago, everyone I showed it to thought it was real. The problem is that in 50 years or less, the fakes will be great and probably be accepted as part of history. Already the books on this subject show fake marks as real. IP: Logged |
Patrick Vyvyan Posts: 640 |
posted 03-10-2004 10:36 AM
Wasn't the phrase "Let us have peace", in an American historical context, coined by Ulysses Grant when accepting the Republican presidential nomination? IP: Logged |
Mefecit@aol.com unregistered |
posted 03-11-2004 07:16 AM
Thanks for the all the help! I had very little hope that this was "right". It is far outside my normal work , so having people with good "eyes" for this period is great! Daniel Tokar IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 03-11-2004 10:39 AM
Daniel, Welcome to the forums. This was a great post/thread. Thank you. Being a silversmith I am sure you see fair amount of interesting and unusual things. If your time permits I would like to suggest that you become a member of the Silver Salon Forums ( Register by clicking here) and to share with us the more interesting. Also
We look forward to your future posts. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |