|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
Silverplate Forum Cattail ice cream spoon
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Cattail ice cream spoon |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 07-27-2017 05:32 PM
I bought a lovely, well-made ice cream spoon with a cattail handle. It's in a style that was popular in 1860s-70s America, where it was made by such manufacturers as Whiting, George Sharp, Wendt, Gorham, and Wood & Hughes, but this spoon is definitely silverplate, not solid--someone made a notch to test it, and the base metal is showing through. It has an odd mark on the back of the bowl, looks like maybe a dragon or an insect in a shield? Anyone recognize the mark? IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 07-27-2017 05:33 PM
The mark: The notch, showing the base metal: IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 07-31-2017 05:16 PM
The seller had two more of the spoons, so I bought them. They have very light traces of gilding on the bowls. I love these spoons.
[This message has been edited by Polly (edited 11-01-2017).] IP: Logged |
agleopar Posts: 850 |
posted 08-01-2017 11:43 PM
Great buy Polly, I think these might be a little rare? IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 08-02-2017 12:44 AM
Polly, The mark looks cast not struck. Perhaps these were made as a special order after the original dye's were exhausted? Or by a different maker to match. Without the dyes, they would sand cast copies from the original sterling pieces. I have seen sterling things copied in a base metal and then silver plated. Its an inexpensive way to replace missing family heirlooms. Whatever is going on, they look great! IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 08-02-2017 12:02 PM
I am not sure whats in the mark...perhaps a double headed eagle? IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 08-02-2017 02:22 PM
It could well be a double-headed eagle--I bet you're right, Scott. But I'm pretty sure these spoons are handmade, not cast: -The scrolly edge at the top of the bowl differs very slightly from spoon to spoon, as if cut by hand So I think some of the pieces were cast--the leaves, cattail, and the round bit right under the cattail--and some were handmade or partly handmade (the bowls and the main part of the handle). Then everything was put together and finished by hand. The work is very skillful. I wish I were a good enough photographer, with a good enough camera, to show these details. I think the mark looks cast because it was stamped on after the stippled matte surface treatment was applied. I also want to say it's stamped on a slightly different spot on each spoon, but I'm not 100% sure of that. [This message has been edited by Polly (edited 08-02-2017).] IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 08-02-2017 02:47 PM
You have them to hold (& love) so your judgement takes priority. Show them to Robert the next time he visits. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 08-02-2017 05:04 PM
I'm not a silversmith or even a metal smith............... I've been doing a mental exercise about how I would make a copy from the original. This is what I came up with:
IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 08-02-2017 06:43 PM
I'll leave it to the actual silversmiths to say whether that would be a good method, but I will say that these spoons were not made that way. The end of the handle was made from at least 6 parts, soldered together: four leaves, the cattail, and the round piece. The bowl was shaped somehow, whether cast or raised or stamped or what, and excess metal was cut off around it to form the elaborately shaped back edge. The part of the handle you're calling the "bar" was pointed and curved at the end to fit against the bowl, then soldered into a slot in the flat part of the bowl the bowl at that end, and to the cattail assemblage at the other. (Your picture of the handle end of the bowl includes a piece that's actually part of the handle, and it fills in the slot where the handle is soldered in.) The matte texture was applied to the bowl. The whole thing was plated with silver, and then the bowl was gilded. If you gentlemen promise to send them back before the summer is over (because we NEED them here for eating ICE CREAM), I can send one to you and one to agleopar to inspect in person. Or I could send two to agleopar, so he can compare them and see that they are not identical enough to be cast from a single mold. I may be wrong about how the bowl was made--I don't really know what combination of raising, casting, repousseeing, jigsawing, and soldering on other elements was involved--but I'm 100% sure the cattail end was made by soldering together separate cast pieces. That's why I really don't think these are casts of a pre-existing sterling/coin piece. I'm confident they were made on their own. I agree it's puzzling that so much hand work went into silverplate, but hey, labor was cheaper back then. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 10-06-2017 12:47 AM
Hey, look at this! A George Sharp ice cream spoon, looks like brother--or at least first cousin--of my cattail spoons. I wonder what the relationship between them is???? Did someone copy a Sharp spoon (simplified, with a different handle end) in silverplate? Am I wrong that this is silverplate? I swear that scratch shows base metal. So strange! quote: IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 10-06-2017 09:52 AM
Did you ever show Robert? IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 10-06-2017 11:50 AM
No, I should send him one. I have a napkin ring that needs to visit Dr. Robert; they could travel together. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 11-01-2017 11:27 AM
I just bid on but did not win a VERY similar spoon. It's the same, except with cut-outs at the edge of the bowl and a little bright-cutting. The seller described it like this: "A Very Unique Spoon by George Sharp Philadelphia, PA 1844-1900 They did not show a photo of the mark. I'm hoping the auction winner is a member of this board and will post about the spoon--especially photos of the mark--or will at least email Scott about the spoon, if he/she doesn't like posting publicly. How I wish I could examine it in person! Scott, now that the auction is over, would it be okay to link to it or to extract photos from the listing? The seller took good photos (of everything but the mark). IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 11-01-2017 12:30 PM
quote: Posting the photo will ensure they remain visible ... don't link. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 11-01-2017 11:45 PM
Here we go--thanks, Scott!
IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 11-02-2017 09:27 AM
[img]http://www.smpub.com/ubb/images/17/21-1442-eb-cattail.jpg[\img] [img]https://www.smpub.com/ubb/images/17/21-1442-eb-cattail.jpg[\img] In the above:
Between the image tags [img] [/img] the URL http://www.smpub.com/ubb/images/17/21-1442-eb-cattail.jpg should be used. We have to reverse engineer the legacy forum Perl/CGI code to eliminate the http: https: issue. Until we get around to doing this please make sure your image URL's don't use https:
IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 11-02-2017 10:59 AM
Thanks, Scott! I tried the / first, but when it didn't work I tried the \, and then when THAT didn't work I gave up and went to bed. The S issue didn't occur to me. IP: Logged |
Paul Lemieux Posts: 1792 |
posted 11-06-2017 10:15 PM
Polly, we can DEFINITELY attribute this pattern to Sharp. I was at an antique shop a few weeks ago and saw it as a mustard ladle. It was clearly marked by George Sharp on the back of the bowl. I was in a hurry and unfortunately didn't think to snap a photo. I didn't buy it as it seemed to have had a small repair where the leaves joined the sides of the cattail... The shop is not too far from NYC (Summit Antiques Center in NJ). However it was very cheap so perhaps worth it just for its scholarly value. [This message has been edited by Paul Lemieux (edited 11-06-2017).] IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 11-06-2017 11:36 PM
Thank you, Paul. I wonder how to explain the fact that mine seem to be silver-plate, not solid? Sharp didn't make plate, did they? So strange! It's possible I'm wrong, but it sure looks like a base metal under the notches to me! IP: Logged |
Paul Lemieux Posts: 1792 |
posted 11-07-2017 10:24 AM
Definitely a puzzler. The quality seems Sharpian but they are obviously not made by Sharp. I have never encountered that mark before. When I used to buy & sell flatware on a more regular basis, I did encounter a handful of fine quality copies of US makers in English silver plate . The construction paralleled the originals. On a side note, I love the finish of the bowl. I have learned that the satin finish might have been created by the sandblasting process. Maybe one of our resident silversmiths like FredZ can provide insight on this--I was thinking of buying a small sandblasting machine for the little pieces I make for myself. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 11-07-2017 12:06 PM
I think Rob (agleopar) told me that matte texture is created with acid etching. Rob, did I misunderstand? Or maybe some is acid etched and some is sand blasted? Paul, if you find yourself in that antiques mall again and the mustard ladle is still there, would you take a few photos for me? Many thanks! IP: Logged |
nutmegr Posts: 58 |
posted 09-27-2019 04:04 PM
I was just browsing, and thought I’d share an example of the pattern of your spoon - although mine is only a demitasse spoon and does not have the pretty bowl of your ice cream spoon. This is marked for George Sharp, with the word “Patent” being the only other mark. I know your ice cream spoon is silverplate, I believe this is coin and it seems clearly to be the pattern on which yours was based (if not cast directly.) I realize this is a very old post - I’m just trying to ease my way into posting again! (And test posting pictures...) —————————— Lisa IP: Logged |
June Martin Forum Master Posts: 1326 |
posted 09-28-2019 12:57 PM
Good job, Lisa. I must admit that I missed this thread the first time around so thanks for bringing it back to life. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
posted 09-29-2019 09:34 PM
Bingo, Lisa! Now I wonder whether George Sharp ever made silver-plate. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |