|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
Continental / International Silver Dutch beaker 1837?
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Dutch beaker 1837? |
MarkMichaels Posts: 4 |
posted 12-22-2004 12:08 PM
A silver (looks like silver to a novice) beaker probably a Jewish Kiddush cup belonging to my gg grandmother Flora born 1837 Groningen Netherlands engraved with her name and a flower drawing carries a single mark on the base. All enclosed in a "squashed" square <> the capital letter C followed by what looks like a small suitcase motif followed by capital letter T. Any help appreciated. [This message has been edited by MarkMichaels (edited 12-22-2004).] IP: Logged |
t-man-nc Posts: 327 |
posted 12-22-2004 01:18 PM
Your site is asking for a password... IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 12-22-2004 07:58 PM
I can't access the photo either, but I'm surprised it has only the maker's mark. Dutch pieces of the period (and today, for that matter) should have four marks: the assay office mark (Perseus' head, with a letter on his helmet indicating the specific office); the standard/fineness mark (a lion); the date letter; and the maker's mark. I'm assuming that the beaker is large enough to hold all four. If not, there was (and still is) a single mark for small items: a dagger, which guaranteed the minimum silver fineness of .833. Check the beaker carefully with a loupe or magnifying glass and see if you can't find any other marks (like the dagger); Dutch pieces can have the marks carefully hidden. That being said, I can't find any Dutch maker "CT" as you describe. Could it be "GT"? If so, then the "suitcase" is actually an old style press, and the mark - "G/press/T", in an oblong hexagon - that of Gerardus Coenraad Abraham Thiensma of Amsterdam, working 1820-1831. I know you said you were a novice, but perhaps you (and other members) might find interesting the following bit of trivia regarding the shape of Dutch maker's marks during the 1st half of the 19th Century. At the beginning of the century, the Netherlands was part of Napoleon's Empire and used the French marks of the time, so Dutch maker's marks were required to be in the form of a lozenge. After Napoleon was defeated, a new Dutch law of 1814 decreed that Dutch maker's marks were to be perfectly square (though the old French-style marks were permitted to be used until they were worn out.) Silversmiths balked at this - the square shape being impractical for small work - so from 1817 on they were allowed to use a rectangular mark for smaller items. The oblong hexagon mark you describe was introduced in 1822. It was reserved for pieces which had lower standard silver solder on them, though the bulk of the piece - 99.8% by weight - had to be of legal fineness. (Apparently some Dutch silversmiths were taking advantage of a loophole in the law which made no restrictions on the use of the lower standard solder and were using it to excess.) G. C. A. Thiensma, as did most early 19th Century silversmiths, had all three marks- square, rectangle and oblong hexagon - available for his use. Dutch marking laws were revised in 1853 and no provision was made for the shape of maker's marks, but most continued with the traditional shapes and their respective uses. Much later, importer's marks were given specific shapes corresponding to the city of the importer, but I'll stop there, since I suspect I've already said more than anyone might find helpful or, for that matter, interesting. :-) [This message has been edited by blakstone (edited 12-22-2004).] IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
posted 12-22-2004 10:09 PM
MarkMichaels,
IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 12-22-2004 10:31 PM
I give up, send me the photos, I will post them. Guessing is ridiculous. IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 12-23-2004 09:48 AM
As it turns out the photo was a sketch, so I won't bother posting it. It was, as described,: CT with a suitcase in between in a lozenge shaped cartouche. That struck me as more likely French, and I asked a few more questions. I haven’t gotten a response but I just sent this note: “ Actually I can, fairly confidently, answer my own questions. The mark was very small probably around 1/8 of an inch long. There was a small mark on the side near the rim. That mark is the head of the Minerva. The maker’s mark is that of Charles TIRBOUR who worked in France c. 1900. Possibly someone on the Forum can narrow that range. Maurice You should post the history of the cup, quite interesting.” I think that solves the mystery. Many novices miss the marks on French pieces as they don’t know where to look. The same is even true of English pieces although I have always thought you would have to be visually impaired in that case. IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 12-23-2004 11:41 AM
Sorry for the wild goose chase, but it sounded like a good guess with no photo to go on. I can add that Charles Tirbour's mark was registered on 8 Jan 1897 and cancelled on 20 Mar 1951. IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 12-23-2004 01:13 PM
Hey I was happy to read the response, even if it didn't pan out. Very interesting post. IP: Logged |
MarkMichaels Posts: 4 |
posted 12-23-2004 01:27 PM
I am awed by the depth of knowledge, thank you all for your assistance. There is a short story behind the cup. My great grandfather was one of six brothers born in Holland. My greatgrandfather's brother Ben married first in France then twice in Spain. I was visiting the niece of the 3rd wife's sister (age 86) and she produced this cup which she said she was certain belonged to Ben's mother Flora. This is the first meeting between these branches of the family for over 50 years. In Jewish tradition such cups are often given at birth. That would be 1837. To confuse matters Ben had a daughter Flora born 1901 in Paris who died in 1904. The cup resides with the elderly lady in Spain, I live in Wales. I will e-mail her grandaughter to enquire about a minerva mark near the rim but it may take a week or two to get an answer. With renewed thanks.Mark IP: Logged |
labarbedor Posts: 353 |
posted 01-02-2005 08:56 PM
We have received pictures of the beaker. So we were right about the French origin of the cup. The mark is only described in my list, but it seems correct. This is also a bit of an education, family stories are always interesting, but quite honestly, rarely accurate. This cup obviously belonged to the second Flora and dates c. 1901. IP: Logged |
wev Moderator Posts: 4121 |
posted 01-02-2005 09:30 PM
IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |