|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
Continental / International Silver Bohemian Tea Strainer & Google Books Research
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Bohemian Tea Strainer & Google Books Research |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 08-28-2009 08:21 PM
[07-0674] Many years ago I bought this tea strainer at an auction (the one where I now work, as it turned out). It’s always been one of my favorite pieces, and the one that started my fascination with these spider-like strainers. It has a gilt interior and bone handle, the latter with scrimshaw-type engraved and stained monogram. The marks are beautiful and clear:
The center mark is that used in the Austrian Empire from 1807 until 1866, with the “13” representing the purity of 13 lot (.833) silver, surrounded by the year “1864” and the letter “B”, the code letter for the assay office in Prague. (The history of this Imperial mark and list of the code letters for it can be found on that very useful research tool, Google Books, in the form of the full text of Karl Knies’ Die Punzirung in Oesterreich. You can also download the text as a PDF file. There are, unfortunately, very few sources for identifying makers from Prague, and the few that exist barely touch upon the 19th century, so I had no luck at all identifying the maker. I even corresponded with the assay office in Prague, and they kindly sent me some great photos of two copper insculpation plates of makers’ marks of the early 19th century, explaining that they were working on creating an encyclopedia of the known marks registered there. Of course, like most projects of its type it is under-funded and under-staffed and the results are still some time off. So there the matter remained. The maker’s mark “HG” is quite legible, and there is an additional clue of another impressed mark: the Austrian Imperial eagle. A similar mark was used by Mayerhofer & Klinkosch in Vienna to indicate that they held a warrant as a supplier to the royal court. Recently, though, I was once again browsing through Google Books (an almost obsessive/compulsive pastime of mine) when I stumbled across a series of German language address books from 1864-1865, one volume of which covered Bohemia, Moravia, Silesia and Krakow. Prague, now part of the Czech Republic, was then the capital of the Kingdom of Bohemia, I remembered, so I eagerly checked the Prague listings for “Gold- und Silberw. Fabriken” and there I found:
quote: This had to be the man – right initials, right time, right place, and bearer of the royal warrant. (The Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in 1864/65 was Ernest II (1818-1893), elder brother of Queen Victoria’s consort, Prince Albert.) But who was H. Grohmann? A little more digging turned up some of the International Exhibition records (1851, London, for instance: “H. Grohmann, Prague: gold trinkets and a set of Bohemian garnets”), but finally I found an exhibition record from the 1845 Third General Austrian Industrial Exhibition in Vienna:
quote: Hieronymus: also, Jerome or (in Czech) Jeronym. More internet searching of these and other variants of his name allowed me to assemble a short biography. Hieronymus Grohmann (12 Sep 1803-1 Dec 1859) received the warrant as court jeweler to the King of Bohemia by 1845. The company had a branch in Hamburg and participated in the International exhibitions in London, 1851 (“Bohemian garnets set in buttons ; buckles, necklaces, smelling-bottles, and bracelets”) and Paris, 1855 (“a magnificent collection of jewellery, comprising coronets, bracelets, bouquets of garnets, rings, necklaces, pins, and more particularly a massive cross of silver, in repousse with gilded niches, in the Gothic style, containing statuettes of the Madonna and Child”) He died at the comparably young age of 56, but his workshop was continued by his widow Aloysia and son Jindrich. The last mention I could find of the firm - evidently best known for its “Bohemian Garnet” jewelry - was around 1873. I’m delighted to have solved this puzzle, and I suspect there are others here who share the deep satisfaction of those “Eureka!” moments provided only by primary research. I heartily encourage those like-minded researchers to explore the richness of Google Books! IP: Logged |
FWG Posts: 845 |
posted 08-29-2009 12:08 PM
Excellent work! And I agree as to the usefulness of Google books, I've found things there (mostly non-silver research) that I never could've found otherwise. I'd offer one proposed correction: I'm pretty certain, even from just a photo, that the handle is ivory, not bone. Very distinctive grain. There is a caveat to Google books, however: In their zeal, they've scanned books that are not, in fact, out of copyright. This has attracted threatened lawsuits from publishers, which, coupled with the Salinger lawsuit, has in turn made some publishers very stickly about tracking down permissions for quoted works. My most recent editorial project was made far more complicated by the increased amount of due diligence the press insisted on in trying to track down possible owners of copyright for uses that should be considered fair and scholarly. IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 08-29-2009 01:48 PM
I’ve gone back and forth with the ivory vs. bone debate on this particular piece for years. What you can’t see is that when viewed head-on, from the tip, it does not show the characteristic “engine-turned” pattern of cross-cut ivory. Also, it does not have the waxy finish of polished ivory: it is dry and distinctly porous. It certainly could be ivory, but there’s definitely reason to doubt it. I suppose that’s the auction cataloguer in me coming out: better to call it bone and have it turn out to be ivory than the other way around! IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 08-29-2009 03:04 PM
Ivory was used because it was more durable than bone, and also could look nicer and was expensive, and so conveyed a higher status to the owner. However, "ivory" and "bone" can be different or alike, depending on the source, so telling them apart is not always so simple. Ivory is tooth enamel, usually dense, shiny, and smooth; usually white, but brownish if getting into the underlying dentine. It can be from Elephant, Walrus, Narwal or Hippopotamus tusk, or Sperm whale tooth. It may be featureless or may show layering, like the growth rings of a tree. Bone can be from arm or leg bones, antlers or horn cores, or other parts of the skeleton, and may differ in density, porosity and appearance - bone from whales and other diving mammals, for instance, can be very dense (pachyostosis) to counteract buoyancy. And both can change with age and exposure to sun and the elements. So if it isn't Elephant tusk ivory or porous bone it isn't always easy to tell. Without hands on examination, I shouldn't even try to guess what yours is, but from what I can see, I wouldn't be surprised if it weren't some kind of ivory - not "high grade" to be sure, but still ivory. IP: Logged |
DB Posts: 252 |
posted 08-29-2009 07:38 PM
Yes, excellent research - I could not find a link to download Karl Knies - Die Punzierung in Oesterreich - would you please give this info. I have very old photocopies of the pages with marks from my student's days, would like to read it again. IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 08-29-2009 08:40 PM
To download the PDF, click the link in my post which will take you to the title page. There, look at the upper right corner of the title page and you should see a download arrow next to the word "PDF" in blue. Click"PDF" and it should start downloading to your computer. You will need Adobe Acrobat (or a comparable PDF) Reader to view or print pages from it. IP: Logged |
DB Posts: 252 |
posted 08-29-2009 10:11 PM
Thanks, but when I follow the link or search google and get the same page, there is no pdf to download - that's actually why I asked. IP: Logged |
dragonflywink Posts: 993 |
posted 08-29-2009 10:40 PM
Perhaps there's a copyright issue for Canadian users and not downloadable? ~Cheryl IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 08-30-2009 12:16 AM
Alas, that does appear to be the case according to Google Books FAQ page. My apologies; I was unaware of the download limitations for non-US users. I remain optimistic, however, that Google's efforts to put hard-to-find references into the hands of those that need them will be assisted by the settlement of the class action suit against them. IP: Logged |
DB Posts: 252 |
posted 08-30-2009 08:32 AM
Thanks for trying to sort this out. IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
posted 09-01-2009 12:45 PM
[<gone from the internet> teleread.org/2009/03/20/dickens-copyfight-with-us-publishers/] Charles Dickens's fight with the U.S. copyright laws highlight some of the issues with the copyright laws. Goggle has tried to work out a business plan where copyright owners are compensated for their work and they are to be commended for that. Maybe they will try next in Canada. As you can see from the Dickens article the history of U.S. companies publishing English author's works in the U.S. without payment worked to the disadvantage of both English author and U.S. authors. The English authors did not receive payment and many if not most of the U.S. authors simply could not complete with the English authors. IP: Logged |
DB Posts: 252 |
posted 09-01-2009 05:19 PM
Google Books is available for Canadians - I tried several links and found the pdf button for downloading. Google Books says that they will soon add pdf buttons for books which don't have them yet - so never give up hope, checking back regularly is probably a good idea. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |