|
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
SMP Silver Salon Forums
Continental / International Silver Fish set vs Dessert set.
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Fish set vs Dessert set. |
jdye Posts: 16 |
posted 09-06-2006 06:15 PM
[26-1194] [Apology to the group. I truly forgot that I asked about this same set in 2004 on the Continental Silver Forum. Failed to do proper search before posting. Lesson learned. The duplication was unintentional. It was here I was told it was a dessert set - still can't quite see how, or why a dessert would need this size pieces. I see, from the earlier posts, that I have learned a lot more about Herr H. R.. Your group is very patient with newbies.] I have a set of very large scale pieces, but only knives, forks, and spoons. I thought it was a fish set but have been told it is a dessert set. Perhaps a discussion of how to tell the difference would be useful. That is my only question. (The flatware is silver, gilded, with hand painted enamel handles. Does it qualify for a question on the silver forum? Newcomer. Guidelines not clear on vermeil. IP: Logged |
FWG Posts: 845 |
posted 09-06-2006 06:42 PM
I checked the source code, and it seems to have lost the last part of the image name in the first one. It's possible Photobucket itself is being wonky today, as I noticed in another thread earlier a missing photo that had been there before. No problem posting vermeil here; I think you'll find people just as interested. In this case, slightly larger (and more) photos would be good - it would be nice to be able to see the enameling. And can you tell us the dimensions? It's hard to tell just how large these are from the photo. Personally I see nothing inappropriate with your use. The gilding may eventually wear with use, is the only thing I'd be worried about. And of course I wouldn't let them go through a dishwasher. Perhaps someone else will be able to offer guidelines for labeling a set as dessert or fish, but my feeling is that in many such cases, without a catalog entry, receipt, or some such record, the intended use cannot be known with certainty. [This message has been edited by FWG (edited 09-06-2006).] IP: Logged |
DB Posts: 252 |
posted 09-06-2006 07:59 PM
What marks did you find on these pieces - Austrian? IP: Logged |
blakstone Posts: 493 |
posted 09-06-2006 11:18 PM
I agree; I get weary of haranguing about the "proper" use of nice silver. If it works, use it and enjoy it. That being said, I think your set is a dessert set. In general, a dessert set may distinguished from a fish set by the sharp, narrow tines of the fork (useless on fish but excellent on fruit), the sharp knife blade (likewise pointless for fish but necessary for fruit), and, usually, the mere presence of spoons (a rich sauce not withstanding, fish was and is properly eaten with a fork). And yes, what are the marks on your set? It looks Austrian or Hungarian to me, too. Very nice! [This message has been edited by blakstone (edited 09-06-2006).] IP: Logged |
jdye Posts: 16 |
posted 09-07-2006 06:50 AM
Yes, Austrian. Herman Ratzersdorfer of Vienna. Between 1872-1881. Mark requires 40x mag to see the 'A' for Vienna, '2' for 900 purity silver, face, and moon. Example from MAK Museum CD on Viennese Marks and Makers Biographies.
Total of six face sculptures - different on front and back of each piece. IP: Logged |
FWG Posts: 845 |
posted 09-07-2006 09:21 AM
Spectacular! Thanks for sharing. It would be perfect, while using the set, to be wearing some of that great Hungarian Renaissance Revival jewelry, of about the same period.... IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 09-07-2006 11:30 AM
Spectacular is right! It looks like something that would have been illustrated in Feeding Desire.
quote: What are the demensions of the pieces? And the case looks like it accommodates 18 pieces, which would be a setting for 6 - are all 18 pieces present? IP: Logged |
doc Posts: 728 |
posted 09-07-2006 12:01 PM
They are amazing! To answer your question about the difference between dessert and fish sets, there are a couple. In fish sets, the forks have 4 tines, and the knives would generally be broader than yours. Many fish knives do have a curved tip, but the blade surface itself is straight, whereas yours have a lovely curve to them. Finally, I have not seen a fish service with spoons-not to say that they don't exist (perhaps for Hollandaise sauce for your salmon?), but it would not be common. I am with the others on this post who have told you to use them as you wish and enjoy them. I hope they bring you joy, and thank you for sharing them with us. IP: Logged |
jdye Posts: 16 |
posted 09-07-2006 01:18 PM
As to size: The photo has one of the Ratzersdorfer spoons and 4 graduated spoons, one for EACH place setting, in a Wm Hutton & Sons Sheffield ElectroPlate Officer's Canteen set 1900-1910. Starting at the right they are: Egg spoon, teaspoon, tablespoon, and 'place spoon'?. The HR spoon is 8.5 inches long. None of these are serving spoons. The Canteen Serving spoons are larger still. IP: Logged |
William Hood Posts: 271 |
posted 09-08-2006 04:45 PM
In my opinion, jdye's set is for dessert. But I would take issue with some of the things Doc said. There is no rule about fish forks having 4 tines and dessert forks having 3; each type may have either 3 or 4. And he said that the blade "surface" (cutting edge?) of fish knives is "straight," not curved. There is more variability in the blades of fish knives than in any other eating knife, but virtually all are shaped rather than having straight up and down margins. Agree that it is unusual to see a spoon as part of a fish set, but I own one example: a modernist (1991) French set by Claude Lalanne that includes a sauce spoon. Also take issue with jdye's identification of his four graduated Sheffield plate spoons. From right to left: coffee spoon?, teaspoon, dessert spoon, tablespoon. IP: Logged |
DB Posts: 252 |
posted 09-08-2006 07:00 PM
H. Ratzersdorfer was one of the most important and prolific manufacturers of fine silver and objects d'art active in Vienna from 1845 to 1894,participant of many world exhibitions and recipient of numerous awards. One of his master pieces was the glass service for the Emperor (now in the Hofsilber and Tafelkammer, Vienna) for which Lobmeyr made the glass and Ratzersdorfer the settings. This set was so fine, that it was never even used at court. Re the story that H. Ratzersdorfer undertook a "destroying mission" of his works later on in life, seems doubtful - on the contrary I would think he could have been justly proud looking back on a productive career and the many honours bestowed on him. ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |