|
In this Forum we discuss the silver of the United Kingdom, as well as British Colonial silver and Old Sheffield Plate. Past British - Irish Sterling topics/threads worth a look. |
|
|
How to Post Photos | Want to be a Moderator? |
SMP Silver Salon Forums
British / Irish Sterling A challenge
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: A challenge |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 01-29-2004 08:19 PM
These marks are found on a typical Hanoverian tablespoon with no particularly distinguishing features. An attempt has been made to obliterate the center mark and pass it off as American coin silver. The maker and locality can be identified without it, but I have been able to bring it up with selective lighting and manipulation in an image editor to a point where it can be recognized (no retouching has been done). Would anyone care to try to identify the locality, maker, and approximate date?
IP: Logged |
Bill H Posts: 31 |
posted 01-29-2004 11:34 PM
My guess: Glasgow Scotland, Adam Graham, 1763-1770 Thanks for these puzzles. Very enjoyable. Bill IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 01-30-2004 12:33 PM
Right again, Bill. As you probably know, since you got this one so quickly, Scottish provincial silver typically has two maker's marks, with a "town mark" of some sort (a pseudohallmark) between (although, just to add to the difficulty, there are sometimes additonal marks, or else none but the maker's mark, making confusion with American silver common). In this case, the center mark is (was) a real hallmark -- for some reason, through much of the 18th Century, date marks were omitted by the Glassgow assay office (a letter, not a date mark, was sometimes used), even though they were used before and after, thus making silver so marked look provincial. Once this was recognized as probably Scottish, it could have been found by looking up the AG maker's mark in the Scottish section of Jackson III. Below is a photo of a (later and smaller) Glasgow "tree, fish, and bell" town mark:
For those unfamiliar with the town symbol of Glasgow, there is a rather flat-topped tree with a bell hanging from the right side; there is a fish placed across the trunk (in some earlier examples the fish may lie below the tree). In addition, there is a bird perched atop the tree. IP: Logged |
adelapt Posts: 418 |
posted 01-30-2004 11:44 PM
And don't forget the ring in the mouth of the fish! (shades of Lord of the Rings ain't it). IP: Logged |
clive taylor unregistered |
posted 07-11-2004 11:39 AM
Just a remark on the Glasgow "Assay Office" There was no such thing until 1819, when one was established by Act of Parliament, mainly to collect plate duty. Although the Guild of Hammmermen probably enforced some standards on their silversmiths , basicaly all gold and silver smiths made there own punches of the Glasgow mark and the Bell Tree and Fish stamp was personal guarantee rather than a supervision mark. Also the Scottish standard was very slightly diiferent to the 925 of sterling IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 09-25-2004 07:52 PM
Now let's see what anyone can do with this one. It is on an Old English teaspoon. Is it the same?
IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 09-30-2004 03:40 PM
In spite of the similarities in the maker's mark, it is not the same. Here are two strikes of the mark of Alexander Gairdner of Edinburgh, Scotland, probably from the same punch, which look remarkably like the mark of Adam Graham of Glasgow:
The upper one is from a later strike of the punch, which is chipped in the same manner as the Graham punch (see the first entry in this thread); it is on an incompletely marked small teaspoon and bears the sovereign's head in use in Edinburgh after 1786, as well as an indistinct thistle standard mark. The lower one, unchipped, is from a fully marked 1784 Edinburgh spoon bearing the incuse sovereign's head used in 1784 and 1785, and therefore is earlier (Glasgow would not have had the sovereign's head mark until 1819, when the "official" assay office was established; that mark differs somewhat in form from those used in Edinburgh). Were it not for the difference in size (3X2 mm for Gairdner's and 5X3 for Graham's) and the different city marks, there could be a real problem in differentiating the two, in light of the similarity in letter form. A possible explanation is that both punches could have been supplied by the same die maker. IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 10-09-2004 06:17 PM
Here is a clearer image of the Gairdner teaspoon marks:
IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 11-26-2004 12:57 PM
Just a note on this thread! It was quite usual (Indeed technically it was the law from 1784) for the larger 'provincial' makers in Scotland to send their wares to Edinburgh to be hallmarked and to pay 'King George's Tax' - Imagine how popular that was!! (They seen to have just sent enough not to get into trouble) This does mean, however, that makers such as Adam Graham and Robert Gray in Glasgow and their compatriots in Perth, Aberdeen, Inverness, Paisley etc. can be found with accompanying Edinburgh marks! - There is ONE surviving register at the Edinburgh Assay Office which is dedicated to makers who registered their marks in Edinburgh, but lived 'outwith the burgh'. This is a good guide as to who were the more important makers in a particular town at a given moment! IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 11-26-2004 01:28 PM
Just for fun - the is a sweet mnemonic for the Glasgow city mark: (see picture above) This is the BELL that never rang. (no mention of the ring!) [This message has been edited by Silver Lyon (edited 11-26-2004).] IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |