|
In this Forum we discuss the silver of the United Kingdom, as well as British Colonial silver and Old Sheffield Plate. Past British - Irish Sterling topics/threads worth a look. |
|
|
How to Post Photos | Want to be a Moderator? |
SMP Silver Salon Forums
British / Irish Sterling "Lord" Bertie's Mug
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: "Lord" Bertie's Mug |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 04-25-2005 10:46 PM
This quart mug, bearing only a maker's mark, belonged to Albemarle Bertie, the ninth Earl of Lindsey (self-styled "Lord Bertie"), who inherited his Earldom late in life, after the passing of the eighth Earl who died without issue. Prior to assuming the title, he had a long military career, rising to the rank of General in 1803. There is in the Peerage records a gap of 31 years between his enlistment in 1762 and his promotion to Major General in 1793, during which he may have been serving somewhere else in the Empire than in England itself. Had he been in the American Colonies, this mug could be of American origin. I have so far been unable to gain access to military records of the period, nor have I been able to identify the mark, which could be English or American (or of some other colony). Any help would be appreciated. Below is a copy of the catalog entry for this item. In another thread there was a question regarding cataloging methods, so I have presented the information in that form, for those who might be interested.
quote: IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 05-12-2005 01:21 PM
I would suggest that this is the maker's mark of JAMES PHIPPS of 40 Gutter Lane, London (just by the Goldsmiths' Hall!! - the Father of the better known Thomas Phipps of 'Phipps and Robinson'. James Phipps (fl.1756-1783) specialised in silver mounts, and his mark (on its own - the silver mounts are generally too light to require hallmarking at this date) is often found on such pieces as coconut cups. [This message has been edited by Silver Lyon (edited 05-12-2005).] IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 05-12-2005 02:24 PM
Thank you, Silver Lyon. I was aware of the exemption for small silver items, which is why I never fully accepted the original American attribution, which became even more tenuous after I traced the provenance. I seldom look as critically at a mark itself, as I did in this case, as it is often unnecessary when other marks are present. My impression, though, is that British marks are better finished than American ones, which did not always come from professional die makers. As can be seen in the second enlarged photo, taken with different lighting than the first, and enhanced (but not retouched) to show the irregularities, this mark has an element of crudeness, which prevented me from ruling out an American origin entirely. In your experience, is this generalization correct? Based on period and speciality, your suggestion of James Phipps I would make him a likely prospect. I have seen only drawn marks, which are insufficient in and of themselves to be definitive in the absence of corroborating information. In order to complete my rcords, perhaps you could tell me on what this attribution is based - have you (or have you seen) actual examples of his mark, or have you published references with photographs of same? I would appreciate any further information along these lines. I would also be interested to know if you (or any other readers of this thread) have or have seen other surviving examples of silver mounted staved vessels of this sort from this period. I have no idea how common these are (or were) - it would seem that if they were more used or less well cared for than this one seems to have been, they could fall apart quite easily after the wood dried out and shrank following regular use. IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 05-12-2005 02:58 PM
So many questions! I will find an example or two of IP to post alongside your pieces. Yes, I agree that most London maker's stamps START OUT crisp and good -they wear out, though, and can appear in a worn state - American maker's stamps are, as you state, often less sophisticated - especially in the colonial period. Simply because, as you state, the necessesary skills were not always present (sometimes, as with Robert Cruickshank in Montreal they bring their London punch with them!) This is however a generalization and dangerous therefore!! IP ascription is from experience. Mugs of this sort are RARE - I have encountered a set of four, two pair and two singletons in 40 odd years (that I have noted - ALL PINT VERSIONS - I haven't noted a quart one!!) - some with and some without silver liners (Set by IP like yours c.1780; pair by HB liner marked for 1781; pair by TB each piece marked for 1791; one by TP IP, 1795!; one unmarked.) - I imagine that they were not too common originally and that the survival rate is bad. (Remember that after 1791 one might expect the mounts to be hallmarked) [This message has been edited by Silver Lyon (edited 05-12-2005).] IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 05-12-2005 03:36 PM
Excellent! Thank you very much - there is no substitute for (your) experience. There wouldn't have been so many questions if it weren't so rare (Although my memory may not be as good as yours, I believe this is the only example I have encountered on this side of the Atlantic)! Regardless of how it arose (the P in this example seems to have elements cut at different levels) the "bump" on the P renders it unique; it and the existence of like pieces by the same maker should be clinchers. I look forward to your supporting pictures. IP: Logged |
Silver Lyon Posts: 363 |
posted 10-26-2005 12:36 PM
These are not my photographs, but kindly sent by Christie's South Kensington in London. But, at last, a piece of James Phipps for comparison! Note the handling of the decoration on the rim. There is a (worn) mark on the rim too!
IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 10-26-2005 01:11 PM
I can offer a couple of suggestions if you are interested in tracing his military career. The period in which he is missing from the record is roughly that from the ending of the Seven Years War (1757-63) to the beginning of the Wars of the French Revolution (1792-1814, intermittantly). Officers were often put on half pay (inactive service) during peace time to save money. Another possiblity is that he served in the British Indian Army (different from the British Army in India). The best way to trace his career might be via his regiment. The Dictionary of National Biography should have the details of his life. His regiment might have a museum with a web page. The National Army Museum in Chelsea does have a web page and records on the regiments. The Public Record Office in Kew Garden could also help. If he did serve in India, the India Office Records, an archive in Lambeth, might also have info on him. Let me know if you run into difficulties. I have done a lot of work at these archives. Good luck, [This message has been edited by tmockait (edited 10-26-2005).] IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 10-26-2005 02:02 PM
quote: Nice coconut cup. Thanks for remembering. Tom: can any of these archives be accessed without going to England? [This message has been edited by swarter (edited 10-26-2005).] IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 10-26-2005 03:11 PM
Swarter, Here are links to web pages for the National Army Museum, the PRO, the India Office, and the Imperial War Museum (which deals mainly with 20th century conflicts). Some records are online, and the PRO offers research services for a fee. However, you might get some one to answer a simple question for you. Good luck, IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |