|
In this Forum we discuss the silver of the United Kingdom, as well as British Colonial silver and Old Sheffield Plate. Past British - Irish Sterling topics/threads worth a look. |
|
|
How to Post Photos | Want to be a Moderator? |
SMP Silver Salon Forums
British / Irish Sterling help with markings
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: help with markings |
napalm Posts: 3 |
posted 04-01-2005 04:49 AM
Could anybody please help me identify these marks? This is from a candelabra I think circa 1719 - London Thanks for any help that you're able to give. IP: Logged |
Argent47 Posts: 67 |
posted 04-01-2005 11:13 AM
Napalm (nice name) May I ask what the reason for your query is? Are you researching the object ? IP: Logged |
napalm Posts: 3 |
posted 04-01-2005 02:50 PM
I'm actually researching it for a friend of mine. If you can help with the dates then that would be good, but I'm more interested in the other markings. I think that the dragon is standing on a cap of maintenance and i think that this signifies a Scottish connection. [This message has been edited by napalm (edited 04-01-2005).] IP: Logged |
TBC Posts: 134 |
posted 04-01-2005 03:29 PM
Hi, My view is that these are London, 1739-40. From the photos, the Leopard's Head Crownedm Dare Letter and Lion Passant all seem to fit. I do not, accordingly, think the Marks are for 1719. As to the Maker's Mark, this is more difficult as the first letter is not legible (to me). The curvacious "G" looks liket the "G" in John Gamon (1739) which fits with my estimated date. However, I'm unhappy with this because although the "I" of the "J" is legible, the mark for John Gamon has a horizontal "}" at its bottom, whereas your mark seems clearly rounded. Perhaps a more knowledgeable member can add to this very amature diagnosis! Rgds, TBC IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 04-01-2005 09:06 PM
TBC, The date letter works, but the shape of the punch for the both the letter "d" and the lion passant don't seem to match those for 1739-40, at least in my source. I am puzzled. Tom [This message has been edited by tmockait (edited 04-01-2005).] IP: Logged |
PhilO Posts: 166 |
posted 04-02-2005 01:39 AM
Tom, Jackson shows, in both the full and "pocket" editions that the shape of the date, town and lion passant punches changed during the 1739-1740 assay year. I think that the marks shown here match very well with the later versions. As to the maker, I looked through Jackson and found several candidates. John Gamon has already been mentioned; I also found James Gould and William Gould. The remaining bit of the first initial does not look like the J for Gamon or James Gould, but is a better match for William Gould, so I would have to go for him as the most probable maker (bearing in mind of course that even Jackson is not 100% comprehensive). Incidentally 1739 seems to have been an interesting year in the silver trade. Following the return to the sterling standard in 1719 many makers had two different marks, one for Britannia standard and one for sterling. Because of the confusion that this led to, an Act of Parliament of 1739 required all makers to destroy their previous marks and to introduce new ones bearing the initials of their first name and surname. Phil IP: Logged |
tmockait Posts: 963 |
posted 04-02-2005 01:52 AM
Thanks for the interesting information. My source does not make that distinction, but it is quite limited. Tom IP: Logged |
Clive E Taylor Posts: 450 |
posted 04-02-2005 04:40 AM
The assay mark is the Lion Passant Guardant introduced afer the Plate Act of 1739 so the piece cannot be 1719. This Lion usually referred to as the "cootage loaf" or "bobbly bottom " lion. For easy date diagnostic purposes the London Lions Passant Guardant after the restoration of the sterling standard fall into three distinct series
1740 - 1756 "Cottage loaf" or "bobbly bottom" 1756 -1822 Cut top cornered punch with a slight point from the middle of the bottom of punch . Usually refered to as "nippled bottom" After 1784 will have the Duty Paid mark of a George Head (in theory ) IP: Logged |
salmoned Posts: 336 |
posted 04-04-2005 02:11 PM
Thanks Clive, your comments often include information of general interest beyond the specific topic and I find it very helpful in enlarging my knowledge base. IP: Logged |
Clive E Taylor Posts: 450 |
posted 04-04-2005 06:44 PM
Thanks salmoned ! Much appreciated . I think if enquiries ae made on specific items, a straight answer is good, but one that enables better diagnosis in future is better. I wish someone had told me some of the things I've painfully had to discover. I have found also that very general knowledge of the period is vital, especially as our mindset is often totally different to two centuries ago IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |