|
In this Forum we discuss the silver of the United Kingdom, as well as British Colonial silver and Old Sheffield Plate. Past British - Irish Sterling topics/threads worth a look. |
|
|
How to Post Photos | Want to be a Moderator? |
SMP Silver Salon Forums
British / Irish Sterling London Hallmarks, 13th Cent - Pres
|
SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: London Hallmarks, 13th Cent - Pres |
francescabocce Posts: 10 |
posted 09-14-2004 09:45 AM
I am student of antique silver and finish paper title "A Brief Outline of London Hallmarks, Early 13th Century to Present". I have 4 things to ask: 1. The Britannia standard is 958,3/1000 or 958,4/1000 . . . math is not very pleasing to me! 2. Corporate year in London was 19 May starting in 1479 (maybe before?). I read that it change to May 29 during the restoration. I believe that this want to say between 1720 and 1739 . . . do anyone know exact the year? 3. Does coinage standard always stay as sterling standard, except when exist only Britannia? 4. My paper is 6 pages. It is in English proper because I have English friend correct it. It would be pleasing to me comments from silver enthusiasts. Is there place i can put it or someone to whom i may it send? Thank you! Francesca IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 09-14-2004 01:35 PM
Welcome to the forums, Francesca. If this paper is a classroom assignment to be submitted for a grade, you really ought to do your own research. As it happens, the answers to your questions are already covered in previous duscussions in this (General) forum and/or in the British and American (coin silver) forums. You can use the search functions in each of these forums to find the answers, or you can use one of the internet search engines (like Google) to find one or more of the excellent web sites that cover the subject - all of this assuming that your library (which is always the best place to start)does not have any of the numerous books on the subject - have you even looked? Good luck in your project. IP: Logged |
francescabocce Posts: 10 |
posted 09-14-2004 02:49 PM
Dear Swarter, Thank you for you comments. I have done much research (more than 20 books in English, French, and Italian) and find many conflicting resources. I think of this forum as more type of resource. I do not think this forum asking "someone else to do my research". IP: Logged |
melissa Posts: 5 |
posted 09-14-2004 03:59 PM
Best working answers from a collector, I rely on Pickford's edition of Jackson's Hallmarks: 1. Statue 8 of William III c.8 "raised the standard for silver plate from ll oz 2 dwts to 11 oz 12 dwts fine" is on page 38 of the book I mentioned above, two pages later he says ll oz 10 dwt. It is simpler to call Brittania standard 958 and leave it at that. 2. Page 41: "The date letters were changed on the day when the wardens [leaders] were elected, that being St. Dunstan's day* (19 May), in each year, prior to the Restoration, and on the 29th May thereafter, until the Hallmarking Act of 1973 which brought all the assay offices into line, each changing its date letter on the first working day of the new year (with effect from 2 January 1975)." To break that down, from about 1300 to 1659 letters changed 19 May; from 1660 to 1974 the change was made on 29 May; since 1975 the date letter changes the first working day after New Years. (Just to complicate matters, there are a few recorded instances of the date letter being altered because of corruption within the Guild, or death of a warden. Worth mentioning, but hard to document.) The Commonwealth governed from 1649 to 1659; 1659 Charles II returned to rule his kingdom, thus "Restoration". *St. Dunstan is the patron saint of English goldsmiths. 3. Page 26: Edward I established the sterling standard for coin and plate by law in 1300. The 1697 law changed the standard only for silver plate; coin standard for silver has always been 925. 4. I have terrible luck with attachments, but if you'd like to send your paper to me at mmcintire@patmedia.net I'll take a look at it. Good luck! IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 09-14-2004 06:57 PM
Francesca: Your assignment is supposed to be a learning experience for you - part of that learning experience is to learn to find sources and to judge their reliability. A discussion forum such as this gives you only more opinions with no real quotable or verifiable source to cite in your paper. What you need is a published source (or sources) that you can quote. Such a source is Sir Charles Jackson's English Goldsmiths and Their Marks or the later revision that Melissa mentions -this book is widely disseminated and one edition or another should be available in libraries in your country (Italy?). In it you will find all of the historical information you seek. If there is conflicting information from elsewhere that you cannot resolve, the proper procedure is to cite both sources and say which you think is right and why - or if you cannot decide, then say so and leave it at that. If you simply ask someone and take their answer, you cannot defend it if you are asked how you arrived at that conclusion. By the same token, someone on the outside should not be proofreading your paper for you - this is supposed to be your work, and no one elses. IP: Logged |
francescabocce Posts: 10 |
posted 09-15-2004 08:14 AM
Melissa, thank you for your comments. They are much help to me. I too make much research from Jackson edited by Pickford, and as you say in #1, there are some mistake, too!! To speak of #1, page 38 is not put in type correct. Britannia standard is 11 ounces, 10 dwt. pure silver per troy pound, as he reads on page 41. I make the conversion 20 dwt = 1 troy ounce and britannia standard become 958.3/1000. If were like he reads on page 38 (11 ounces, 12 dwt. per troy pound), britannia standard become 966.7/1000. To speak of something different, this paper is not for university but for my personal culture. I am gemologist, appraiser, and university level instructor of antique italian jewellery but silver is very pleasing to me. I am student also in all things that I teach and make in sense that I am never finish to learn (very obvious english, too!). I like comment of all person interested because I think all have something to think and give. Some opinion I give more value because they are say from someone that has more knowledge now, but maybe not for always. Books, people, professors, students, and I all make mistakes, usually to talk much and not to listen enough. If someone else has more comments, or is please to read my paper, please tell to me!! Thank you very much! Francesca IP: Logged |
swarter Moderator Posts: 2920 |
posted 09-15-2004 05:29 PM
quote: The official standard mark now used for Britannia is 958.4, so the first figure given is indeed the misprint - it should read 11 oz 10 dwt. IP: Logged |
francescabocce Posts: 10 |
posted 09-16-2004 01:08 AM
Dear Swarter, Thank you for the confirmation. There is a one thing that I still do not understand. I make the conversion 11 oz, 10 dwt to become 230 dwt. I next divide by total 12 oz, that make 240 dwt. 230 divide by 240 i receive .958333333333333. Like I say before, math is not very pleasing to me, but how i understand this stay at 958,3/1000. How do english find 958,4/1000? (maybe too much ale?!! only to joke!!!) Maybe my conversion are not correct? I make them like this: 1 troy ounce = 20 dwt. Maybe like I say before that my math is not right. But if someone try to explain to me, it be very nice of he!! Thank you for your share! Francesca IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11573 |
posted 09-16-2004 08:30 AM
Maybe the SMP online calculator will be helpful. Per the SMP online calculator: If anyone detects math or rounding errors in our calculator - please let me know. IP: Logged |
francescabocce Posts: 10 |
posted 09-16-2004 05:49 PM
Hi Scott!! Thank you for reply! So I try the numbers from SMP calculator 11troy ounce, 10dwt like you say at 229.9982 and I divide by troy pound (12 troy ounce) at 239.9981 and answer become .9583334201, that I understand 958.3 I do not make math good but think I do not make mistake here. Can someone give to me answer? Thank you!!!! Franci IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |